Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32780237›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2021

SpyGlass-guided laser lithotripsy versus laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for large common bile duct stones: a non-inferiority trial.

Guodong Li, Qiuping Pang, Hailan Zhai, Xiujuan Zhang, Yanchun Dong, Ji Li, Xinyong Jia

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cholangioscopy-guided tunneling and coaxial stenting of a large choledocholithiasis: a novel approach to mechanical lithotripsy.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Cracking Difficult Biliary Stones.Clinical endoscopy · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guodong LiDepartment of Endoscopy, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical, University, 250014, Jinan, China.
Qiuping PangDepartment of Endoscopy, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical, University, 250014, Jinan, China. pangqiuping123@163.com.
Hailan ZhaiDepartment of Endoscopy, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical, University, 250014, Jinan, China.
Xiujuan ZhangDepartment of Endoscopy, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical, University, 250014, Jinan, China.
Yanchun DongDepartment of Endoscopy, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical, University, 250014, Jinan, China.
Ji LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, 250014, Jinan, China.
Xinyong JiaDepartment of Endoscopy, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical, University, 250014, Jinan, China. jiaxy0505@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is the first choice of treatment for large common bile duct (CBD) stones. Recently, single-operator cholangioscopy (SpyGlass system) has been introduced widely in referral and large medical centers. Several studies have reported favorable results for treatment of large CBD stones guided by SpyGlass. We evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of SpyGlass-guided laser lithotripsy LCBDE for treatment of large CBD stones.

methodsFrom August 2015 to August 2018, 157 patients with large bile duct stones who met the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into two groups: SpyGlass-guided laser lithotripsy (Group A) and LCBDE (Group B). The efficacy and complications were compared between the groups.

resultsAlthough the first-session stone removal rate in Group A was significantly lower than that in Group B, Group A was not inferior to Group B in terms of total stone removal rate. Compared with Group B, Group A had shorter hospital stay and enhanced recovery. The short-term complication rates were also similar between the two groups.

conclusionsThe clinical efficacy of SpyGlass-guided laser lithotripsy for the treatment of large CBD stones is not inferior to that of LCBDE, and it is less invasive. SpyGlass-guided laser lithotripsy is an important option for treatment of large CBD stones.

Indexed as

CholedocholithiasisGallstonesLaparoscopyLithotripsy, LaserCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCommon Bile DuctHumansTreatment OutcomeCommon bile duct explorationCommon bile duct stonesLaparoscopyLaser lithotripsy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.