Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32780229›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2021

Safety of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 and other diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 53 randomized trials.

Can Chen, Kunming Pan, Bingjie Wu, Xiaoye Li, Zhangzhang Chen, Qing Xu, Xiaoyu Li, Qianzhou Lv

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Assessment of Recovery Time, Worsening, and Death among Inpatients and Outpatients with COVID-19, Treated with Hydroxychloroquine or Chloroquine plus Azithromycin Combination in Burkina Faso.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Can Chen *Department of Pharmacy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Kunming Pan *Department of Pharmacy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Bingjie WuDepartment of Rheumatology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Xiaoye LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Zhangzhang ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Qing XuDepartment of Pharmacy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Xiaoyu LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China. li.xiaoyu@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Qianzhou LvDepartment of Pharmacy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China. lv.qianzhou@zs-hospital.sh.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0866-1546
Sun Yat-sen University · CNFudan University · CN

Funding

Key Clinical Specialty of Shanghai (Clinical Pharmacy) No.shslczdzk06504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany concerns still exist regarding the safety of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in the treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of HCQ in the treatment of COVID-19 and other diseases by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis.

methodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the safety of HCQ in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were retrieved starting from the establishment of the database till June 5, 2020. Literature screening, data extraction, and assessment of risk bias were performed independently by two reviewers.

resultsWe identified 53 eligible studies involving 5496 patients. The meta-analysis indicated that the risk of adverse effects (AEs) in the HCQ group was significantly increased compared with that in the control group (RD 0.05, 95%CI, 0.02 to 0.07, P = 0.0002), and the difference was also statistically significant in the COVID-19 subgroup (RD 0.15, 95%CI, 0.07 to 0.23, P = 0.0002) as well as in the subgroup for other diseases (RD 0.03, 95%CI, 0.01 to 0.04, P = 0.003).

conclusionsHCQ is associated with a high total risk of AEs compared with the placebo or no intervention in the overall population. Given the small number of COVID-19 participants included, we should be cautious regarding the conclusion stating that HCQ is linked with an increase incidence of AEs in patients with COVID-19, which we hope to confirm in the future through well-designed and larger sample size studies.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentSARS-CoV-2CardiotoxicityGastrointestinal TractHumansHydroxychloroquineOutcome Assessment, Health CarePublication BiasSkinHydroxychloroquineCOVID-19HydroxychloroquineRandomized controlled trialSafetySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32780229
PMCPMC7417776
OpenAlexW3048274254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.