ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2021
Endocarditis prophylaxis in daily practice of pediatricians and dentists in Flanders.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Australian dental students' knowledge on antibiotics prophylaxis for dental procedures.BMC oral health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endocarditis is a potentially life-threatening disease in children with congenital heart disease (CHD) and correct prophylaxis (EP) is of utmost importance. We conducted two surveys among pediatricians and dentists in Flanders about their knowledge of EP guidelines. The survey was completed by 910 dentists and 100 pediatricians. Sixty-five percent of the dentists did not know any guideline. They relied for information on the internet or the child's physician. 87% identified low risk treatments correctly, but only 64% identified high risk procedures correctly. Eighty-three percent asked for the presence of CHD and allergy to antibiotics. Dentists asked advice of the patient's physician, but 29% would withhold treatments in high-risk patients and 50% did not know the pediatric antibiotic dosages. Forty-seven percent of the pediatricians did not know EP guidelines and they would preferably contact the child's cardiologist. Pediatricians had difficulties with the identification of low-risk procedures and would give unnecessary antibiotics. They identified most CHD at high risk, but scored lower for the identification of lower risk CHD.Conclusion: The knowledge of Flemish dentists and pediatricians of EP guidelines is low. The knowledge about EP guidelines and the communication between dentists and pediatricians should be improved. Patients should be provided with an individual EP card. What is Known: • The knowledge of dentists and cardiologists about EP is not perfect, which has already been described. • There are several guidelines about EP, and they are not identical and sometimes confusing. What is New: • This is the first article combining large scale surveys of the knowledge and application of EP by dentists and pediatricians, allowing us to compare knowledge and gaps of knowledge and use their complementarity in order to offer tailored solutions and use patient education and partnership.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.