Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32780174›Full record

SynthesisInternational urogynecology journal2020

Effects of non-ablative Er:YAG laser on the skin and the vaginal wall: systematic review of the clinical and experimental literature.

Lucie Hympanova, Katerina Mackova, Moetaz El-Domyati, Eva Vodegel, Jan-Paul Roovers, Jan Bosteels, Ladislav Krofta, Jan Deprest

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Long-term efficacy and safety of carbon dioxide (COAmerican journal of translational research · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Lucie HympanovaCentre for Surgical Technologies, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Katerina MackovaCentre for Surgical Technologies, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Moetaz El-DomyatiDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Minia University, Al-Minya, Egypt.
Eva VodegelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan-Paul RooversDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan BosteelsDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Woman and Child, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ladislav KroftaInstitute for the Care of Mother and Child, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan DeprestCentre for Surgical Technologies, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. Jan.Deprest@uzleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4920-945X
Charles University · CZAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLKU Leuven · BEMinia University · EG

Funding

Univerzita Karlova v Praze Progress Q34
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisEr:YAG laser is frequently used in dermatology and gynecology. Clinical studies document high satisfaction rates; however, hard data on the effects at the structural and molecular levels are limited. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize current knowledge about the objective effects of non-ablative Er:YAG laser on the skin and vaginal wall.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and the Web of Science. Studies investigating objectively measured effects of non-ablative Er:YAG laser on the skin or vaginal wall were included. Studies of any design were included. Owing to the lack of methodological uniformity, no meta-analysis could be performed and therefore results are presented as a narrative review.

resultsWe identified in vitro or ex vivo studies on human cells or tissues, studies in rats, and clinical studies. Most studies were on the skin (n = 11); the rest were on the vagina (n = 4). The quality of studies is limited and the settings of the laser were very diverse. Although the methods used were not comparable, there were demonstrable effects in all studies. Immediately after application the increase in superficial temperature, partial preservation of epithelium and subepithelial extracellular matrix coagulation were documented. Later, an increase in epithelial thickness, inflammatory response, fibroblast proliferation, an increase in the amount of collagen, and vascularization were described.

conclusionsEr:YAG laser energy may induce changes in the deeper skin or vaginal wall, without causing unwanted epithelial ablation. Laser energy initiates a process of cell activation, production of extracellular matrix, and tissue remodeling.

Indexed as

Lasers, Solid-StateLaser TherapyAnimalsFemaleRatsSkinVaginaCollagenDermisEpidermisHistologyLaserResurfacing

Identifiers

PMID32780174
OpenAlexW3048569258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.