Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32780164›Full record

ArticleProtoplasma2020

EMAC, Retromer, and VSRs: do they connect?

Rumen Ivanov, David G Robinson

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protoplasma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cargo Sorting Zones in Plant Trans-Golgi Network.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The sorting of cargo proteins in the plantFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rumen IvanovInstitute of Botany, Heinrich Heine University, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. rumen.ivanov@uni-duesseldorf.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7909-4123
David G RobinsonCentre for Organismal Studies, University of Heidelberg, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0394-490X
Heidelberg University · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 267205415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic organisms share many common features in terms of endomembrane trafficking. This fact has helped plant scientists to propose testable hypotheses on how plant intracellular membrane trafficking is achieved and regulated based on knowledge from yeast and mammals. However, when a new compartment has been identified in a plant cell that has a vesicle tethering complex located at a position which is completely different to its counterpart in yeast and mammalian cells, caution is demanded when interpreting possible interactions with other trafficking elements. This is exemplified by the recently discovered EMAC (ER and microtubule-associated compartment). It has been postulated that this compartment is the recipient of vacuolar sorting receptors (VSRs) transported retrogradely via "retromer vesicles" from a post-Golgi location. Unfortunately, this suggestion was based entirely on our knowledge of retromer from yeast and mammalian cells, and did not take into account the available literature on the composition, localization, and function of the plant retromer. It also lacked reference to recent contradictory findings on VSR trafficking. In this short article, we have tried to rectify this situation, pointing out that plant retromer may not function as a pentameric complex of two subunits: the retromer core and the sorting nexins.

Indexed as

Biological TransportGolgi ApparatusSorting NexinsVacuolesSorting NexinsEndomembrane traffickingRetromerSNXSorting nexinSubcellular localizationVPS26-VPS35-VPS29

Identifiers

PMID32780164
PMCPMC8286218
OpenAlexW3048864304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.