Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32780139›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2020

Effect of High Add Power, Medium Add Power, or Single-Vision Contact Lenses on Myopia Progression in Children: The BLINK Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jeffrey J Walline, Maria K Walker, Donald O Mutti, Lisa A Jones-Jordan, Loraine T Sinnott, Amber Gaume Giannoni, Katherine M Bickle, Krystal L Schulle, Alex Nixon, Gilbert E Pierce and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02255474 (Soft Bifocal Contact Lens Myopia Control), which is not on this map. Cited by 148 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
23.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02255474 nacompletednot on this map

Soft Bifocal Contact Lens Myopia Control

TypeinterventionalSponsorOhio State UniversityRan2014 to 2019Enrolled294ConditionsRefractive ErrorsArmsBiofinity Multifocal D +1.50 add, Biofinity Multifocal D +2.50 add, Biofinity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 279 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Myopia control efficacy of individualised ocular refraction customisation spectacle lenses: A 2-year follow-up study.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Trial
  16. Frequency of retinal findings after 8 years in the Bifocal Lenses in Nearsighted Kids (BLINK) Study.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Trial
  17. Optical characterisation and vision quality assessment of two myopia control contact lenses.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Trial
  18. Myopia control using a modified optical defocus soft contact lens in schoolchildren-A 12-month randomised double masked control trial.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey J WallineThe Ohio State University College of Optometry; Columbus.
Maria K WalkerUniversity of Houston College of Optometry; Houston, Texas.
Donald O MuttiThe Ohio State University College of Optometry; Columbus.
Lisa A Jones-JordanThe Ohio State University College of Optometry; Columbus.
Loraine T SinnottThe Ohio State University College of Optometry; Columbus.
Amber Gaume GiannoniUniversity of Houston College of Optometry; Houston, Texas.
Katherine M BickleThe Ohio State University College of Optometry; Columbus.
Krystal L SchulleUniversity of Houston College of Optometry; Houston, Texas.
Alex NixonThe Ohio State University College of Optometry; Columbus.
Gilbert E PierceThe Ohio State University College of Optometry; Columbus.
David A BerntsenUniversity of Houston College of Optometry; Houston, Texas.
BLINK Study Group
SUNY College of Optometry · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Houston · USHouston Independent School District · USJohnson & Johnson (United States) · US

Funding

The Ohio State University Center for clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001070 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2013 to 2017
$22.6M
Communication Implementation and Coordination for NIH Precision Medicine Initiative Research ProjectsOT2OD023206 · OD · HCM STRATEGISTS, LLC · PI TEPP, RONNIE · 2016 to 2019
$22.4M
Research Programming ModuleP30EY007551 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI LAURA J. FRISHMAN · 1988 to 2026
$16.4M
Soft Bifocal Contact Lens Myopia Control - Clincal CenterU10EY023210 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MUTTI, DONALD O. · 2014 to 2018
$2.9M
Examination of Myopia Progression and Consequences and Mechanism of Soft Multifocal Contact Lens Myopia Control - Clinical CenterUG1EY023204 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI BERNTSEN, DAVID A · 2019 to 2023
$2.7M
Soft Bifocal Contact Lens Myopia ControlU10EY023204 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI BERNTSEN, DAVID A · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
Examination of Myopia Progression and Consequences and Mechanism of Soft Multifocal Contact Lens Myopia Control - Clinical CenterUG1EY023210 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MUTTI, DONALD O. · 2019 to 2023
$2.6M
Soft Bifocal Contact Lens Myopia Control - Data Coordinating CenterU10EY023206 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JORDAN, LISA A · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
DEVELOPMENT CHANGES IN NEURONAL FORM AND FUNCTIONR01NS023208 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI WEEKS, JANIS C · 1986 to 2002
$808k
Soft Bifocal Contact Lens Myopia Control - Study ChairU10EY023208 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WALLINE, JEFFREY JAY · 2014 to 2018
$742k
Examination of Myopia Progression and Consequences and Mechanism of Soft Multifocal Contact Lens Myopia ControlUG1EY023208 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WALLINE, JEFFREY JAY · 2019 to 2023
$678k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001070NEI NIH HHS P30 EY007551NEI NIH HHS U10 EY023204NEI NIH HHS U10 EY023206NEI NIH HHS U10 EY023208NEI NIH HHS U10 EY023210NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY023204NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY023208NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY023210NIH HHS OT2 OD023206NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS023208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Slowing myopia progression could decrease the risk of sight-threatening complications. Objective: To determine whether soft multifocal contact lenses slow myopia progression in children, and whether high add power (+2.50 D) slows myopia progression more than medium (+1.50 D) add power lenses. Design, Setting, and Participants: A double-masked randomized clinical trial that took place at 2 optometry schools located in Columbus, Ohio, and Houston, Texas. A total of 294 consecutive eligible children aged 7 to 11 years with -0.75 D to -5.00 D of spherical component myopia and less than 1.00 D astigmatism were enrolled between September 22, 2014, and June 20, 2016. Follow-up was completed June 24, 2019. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to wear high add power (n = 98), medium add power (n = 98), or single-vision (n = 98) contact lenses. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the 3-year change in cycloplegic spherical equivalent autorefraction, as measured by the mean of 10 autorefraction readings. There were 11 secondary end points, 4 of which were analyzed for this study, including 3-year eye growth. Results: Among 294 randomized participants, 292 (99%) were included in the analyses (mean [SD] age, 10.3 [1.2] years; 177 [60.2%] were female; mean [SD] spherical equivalent refractive error, -2.39 [1.00] D). Adjusted 3-year myopia progression was -0.60 D for high add power, -0.89 D for medium add power, and -1.05 D for single-vision contact lenses. The difference in progression was 0.46 D (95% CI, 0.29-0.63) for high add power vs single vision, 0.30 D (95% CI, 0.13-0.47) for high add vs medium add power, and 0.16 D (95% CI, -0.01 to 0.33) for medium add power vs single vision. Of the 4 secondary end points, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups for 3 of the end points. Adjusted mean eye growth was 0.42 mm for high add power, 0.58 mm for medium add power, and 0.66 mm for single vision. The difference in eye growth was -0.23 mm (95% CI, -0.30 to -0.17) for high add power vs single vision, -0.16 mm (95% CI, -0.23 to -0.09) for high add vs medium add power, and -0.07 mm (95% CI, -0.14 to -0.01) for medium add power vs single vision. Conclusions and Relevance: Among children with myopia, treatment with high add power multifocal contact lenses significantly reduced the rate of myopia progression over 3 years compared with medium add power multifocal and single-vision contact lenses. However, further research is needed to understand the clinical importance of the observed differences. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02255474.

Indexed as

Contact Lenses, HydrophilicChildDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMyopiaOhioRefraction, OcularSample SizeTexasTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32780139
PMCPMC7420158
OpenAlexW3048606831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.