Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32780110›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2020

Effects of a microencapsulated formula of organic acids and essential oils on nutrient absorption, immunity, gut barrier function, and abundance of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli F4 in weaned piglets challenged with E. coli F4.

Janghan Choi, Lucy Wang, Shangxi Liu, Peng Lu, Xiaoya Zhao, Haoming Liu, Ludovic Lahaye, Elizabeth Santin, Song Liu, Martin Nyachoti and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  15. Dietary supplementation ofFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  16. Functional evaluation ofTranslational animal science · 2024
    Article
  17. Effects of EnterotoxigenicMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  18. Effects of DifferentAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  19. Research progress on anti-stress nutrition strategies in swine.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2023
    Review
  20. Effects of dietary supplementation ofJournal of animal science and technology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Janghan ChoiDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Lucy WangDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Shangxi LiuDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Peng LuDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Xiaoya ZhaoDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Haoming LiuDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Ludovic LahayeJefo Nutrition Inc., Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.
Elizabeth SantinJefo Nutrition Inc., Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.
Song LiuDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Martin NyachotiDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Chengbo YangDepartment of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
University of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective was to study the effects of microencapsulated organic acids (OA) and essential oils (EO) on growth performance, immune system, gut barrier function, nutrient digestion and absorption, and abundance of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli F4 (ETEC F4) in the weaned piglets challenged with ETEC F4. Twenty-four ETEC F4 susceptible weaned piglets were randomly distributed to 4 treatments including (1) sham-challenged control (SSC; piglets fed a control diet and challenged with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)); (2) challenged control (CC; piglets fed a control diet and challenged with ETEC F4); (3) antibiotic growth promoters (AGP; CC + 55 mg·kg-1 of Aureomycin); and (4) microencapsulated OA and EO [P(OA+EO); (CC + 2 g·kg-1 of microencapsulated OA and EO]. The ETEC F4 infection significantly induced diarrhea at 8, 28, 34, and 40 hr postinoculation (hpi) (P < 0.05) in the CC piglets. At 28 d postinoculation (dpi), piglets fed P(OA+EO) had a lower (P < 0.05) diarrhea score compared with those fed CC, but the P(OA+EO) piglets had a lower (P < 0.05) diarrhea score compared with those fed the AGP diets at 40 dpi. The ETEC F4 infection tended to increase in vivo gut permeability measured by the oral gavaging fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran 70 kDa (FITC-D70) assay in the CC piglets compared with the SCC piglets (P = 0.09). The AGP piglets had higher FITC-D70 flux than P(OA+EO) piglets (P < 0.05). The ETEC F4 infection decreased mid-jejunal VH in the CC piglets compared with the SCC piglets (P < 0.05). The P(OA+EO) piglets had higher (P < 0.05) VH in the mid-jejunum than the CC piglets. The relative mRNA abundance of Na+-glucose cotransporter and B0AT1 was reduced (P < 0.05) by ETEC F4 inoculation when compared with the SCC piglets. The AGP piglets had a greater relative mRNA abundance of B0AT1 than the CC piglets (P < 0.05). The ETEC F4 inoculation increased the protein abundance of OCLN (P < 0.05), and the AGP piglets had the lowest relative protein abundance of OCLN among the challenged groups (P < 0.05). The supplementation of microencapsulated OA and EO enhanced intestinal morphology and showed anti-diarrhea effects in weaned piglets challenged with ETEC F4. Even if more future studies can be required for further validation, this study brings evidence that microencapsulated OA and EO combination can be useful within the tools to be implemented in strategies for alternatives to antibiotics in swine production.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarboxylic AcidsChlortetracyclineDiarrheaDietDrug CompoundingEnterotoxigenic Escherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeImmunityJejunumMaleNutrientsOils, VolatileAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarboxylic AcidsChlortetracyclineNutrientsOils, VolatileEscherichia coli F4essential oilsgut healthmicroencapsulationorganic acidsweaned piglets

Identifiers

PMID32780110
PMCPMC7526869
OpenAlexW3048372430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.