ArticleMutagenesis2020
Adaptation of the in vitro micronucleus assay for genotoxicity testing using 3D liver models supporting longer-term exposure durations.
Article in Mutagenesis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantifying Ultra-Low Pigment Solubilities by UV-Vis Spectroscopy: Implications for Toxicological Assessment.ACS measurement science au · 2026Article
- Article
- 3D Liver Models for Genotoxicity Testing.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- CHIASMA: Advancing chemicals and materials safety and sustainability assessments through innovative integration of in vitro and in silico (new approach) methodologies.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Development of an Easy-To-Use Microfluidic System to Assess Dynamic Exposure to Mycotoxins in 3D Culture Models: Evaluation of Ochratoxin A and Patulin Cytotoxicity.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Application of HepaRG cells for genotoxicity assessment: a review.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Toxicology and carcinogenesis · 2024Review
- Current status and future challenges of genotoxicity OECD Test Guidelines for nanomaterials: a workshop report.Mutagenesis · 2023Article
- Review
- High-throughput micronucleus assay using three-dimensional HepaRG spheroids for in vitro genotoxicity testing.Archives of toxicology · 2023Article
- Combined Toxic Effects of BPA and Its Two Analogues BPAP and BPC in a 3D HepG2 Cell Model.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The State of the Art and Challenges of In Vitro Methods for Human Hazard Assessment of Nanomaterials in the Context of Safe-by-Design.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Adverse (geno)toxic effects of bisphenol A and its analogues in hepatic 3D cell model.Environment international · 2023Article
- Replacement of animal testing by integrated approaches to testing and assessment (IATA): a call for in vivitrosi.Archives of toxicology · 2022Review
- Organoids for toxicology and genetic toxicology: applications with drugs and prospects for environmental carcinogenesis.Mutagenesis · 2022Article
- DMSO-free highly differentiated HepaRG spheroids for chronic toxicity, liver functions and genotoxicity studies.Archives of toxicology · 2022Article
- Suitability of the In Vitro Cytokinesis-Block Micronucleus Test for Genotoxicity Assessment of TiOInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Understanding the impact of more realistic low-dose, prolonged engineered nanomaterial exposure on genotoxicity using 3D models of the human liver.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2021Article
- Genotoxicity of Nanomaterials: Advanced In Vitro Models and High Throughput Methods for Human Hazard Assessment-A Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Following advancements in the field of genotoxicology, it has become widely accepted that 3D models are not only more physiologically relevant but also have the capacity to elucidate more complex biological processes that standard 2D monocultures are unable to. Whilst 3D liver models have been developed to evaluate the short-term genotoxicity of chemicals, the aim of this study was to develop a 3D model that could be used with the regulatory accepted in vitro micronucleus (MN) following low-dose, longer-term (5 days) exposure to engineered nanomaterials (ENMs). A comparison study was carried out between advanced models generated from two commonly used liver cell lines, namely HepaRG and HepG2, in spheroid format. While both spheroid systems displayed good liver functionality and viability over 14 days, the HepaRG spheroids lacked the capacity to actively proliferate and, therefore, were considered unsuitable for use with the MN assay. This study further demonstrated the efficacy of the in vitro 3D HepG2 model to be used for short-term (24 h) exposures to genotoxic chemicals, aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and methyl-methanesulfonate (MMS). The 3D HepG2 liver spheroids were shown to be more sensitive to DNA damage induced by AFB1 and MMS when compared to the HepG2 2D monoculture. This 3D model was further developed to allow for longer-term (5 day) ENM exposure. Four days after seeding, HepG2 spheroids were exposed to Zinc Oxide ENM (0-2 µg/ml) for 5 days and assessed using both the cytokinesis-block MN (CBMN) version of the MN assay and the mononuclear MN assay. Following a 5-day exposure, differences in MN frequency were observed between the CBMN and mononuclear MN assay, demonstrating that DNA damage induced within the first few cell cycles is distributed across the mononucleated cell population. Together, this study demonstrates the necessity to adapt the MN assay accordingly, to allow for the accurate assessment of genotoxicity following longer-term, low-dose ENM exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.