Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32780026›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Understanding the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Efficacy of a Clinical Pharmacist-led Mobile Approach (BPTrack) to Hypertension Management: Mixed Methods Pilot Study.

Lorraine R Buis, Dana N Roberson, Reema Kadri, Nicole G Rockey, Melissa A Plegue, Shivang U Danak, Timothy C Guetterman, Melanie G Johnson, Hae Mi Choe, Caroline R Richardson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02898584 (Utilizing Consumer Health Informatics to Support Management of Hypertension by Clinical Pharmacists in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02898584 nacompletednot on this map

Utilizing Consumer Health Informatics to Support Management of Hypertension by Clinical Pharmacists in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MichiganRan2016 to 2020Enrolled16ConditionsHypertensionArmsBP Track
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lorraine R BuisDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5855-9972
Dana N RobersonDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5719-7818
Reema KadriDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0935-3761
Nicole G RockeyPharmacy Innovations and Partnerships, University of Michigan Medical Group, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3645-9019
Melissa A PlegueDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6032-534X
Shivang U DanakDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0677-7921
Timothy C GuettermanDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0093-858X
Melanie G JohnsonCollege of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0639-2573
Hae Mi ChoePharmacy Innovations and Partnerships, University of Michigan Medical Group, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4642-3864
Caroline R RichardsonDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1945-6046
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MCHR)UL1TR000433 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MASHOUR, GEORGE ALEXANDER · 2012 to 2016
$49.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertension is a prevalent and costly burden in the United States. Clinical pharmacists within care teams provide effective management of hypertension, as does home blood pressure monitoring; however, concerns about data quality and latency are widespread. One approach to close the gap between clinical pharmacist intervention and home blood pressure monitoring is the use of mobile health (mHealth) technology.

objectiveWe sought to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of BPTrack, a clinical pharmacist-led intervention that incorporates patient- and clinician-facing apps to make electronically collected, patient-generated data available to providers in real time for hypertension management. The patient app also included customizable daily medication reminders and educational messages. Additionally, this study sought to understand barriers to adoption and areas for improvement identified by key stakeholders, so more widespread use of such interventions may be achieved.

methodsWe conducted a mixed methods pilot study of BPTrack, to improve blood pressure control in patients with uncontrolled hypertension through a 12-week pre-post intervention. All patients were recruited from a primary care setting where they worked with a clinical pharmacist for hypertension management. Participants completed a baseline visit, then spent 12 weeks utilizing BPTrack before returning to the clinic for follow-up. Collected data from patient participants included surveys pre- and postintervention, clinical measures (for establishing effectiveness, with the primary outcome being a change in blood pressure and the secondary outcome being a change in medication adherence), utilization of the BPTrack app, interviews at follow-up, and chart review. We also conducted interviews with key stakeholders.

resultsA total of 15 patient participants were included (13 remained through follow-up for an 86.7% retention rate) in a single group, pre-post assessment pilot study. Data supported the hypothesis that BPTrack was feasible and acceptable for use by patient and provider participants and was effective at reducing patient blood pressure. At the 12-week follow-up, patients exhibited significant reductions in both systolic blood pressure (baseline mean 137.3 mm Hg, SD 11.1 mm Hg; follow-up mean 131.0 mm Hg, SD 9.9 mm Hg; P=.02) and diastolic blood pressure (baseline mean 89.4 mm Hg, SD 7.7 mm Hg; follow-up mean 82.5 mm Hg, SD 8.2 mm Hg; P<.001). On average, patients uploaded at least one blood pressure measurement on 75% (SD 25%) of study days. No improvements in medication adherence were noted. Interview data revealed areas of improvement and refinement for the patient experience. Furthermore, stakeholders require integration into the electronic health record and a modified clinical workflow for BPTrack to be truly useful; however, both patients and stakeholders perceived benefits of BPTrack when used within the context of a clinical relationship.

conclusionsResults demonstrate that a pharmacist-led mHealth intervention promoting home blood pressure monitoring and clinical pharmacist management of hypertension can be effective at reducing blood pressure in primary care patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Our data also support the feasibility and acceptability of these types of interventions for patients and providers.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02898584; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02898584. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/resprot.8059.

Indexed as

Treatment OutcomeFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPharmacistsPilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineblood pressurecell phonehypertensionmedication adherencemobile phonepharmaciststelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32780026
PMCPMC7448180
OpenAlexW3034212911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.