Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32780025›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

The Acceptability and Impact of the Xploro Digital Therapeutic Platform to Inform and Prepare Children for Planned Procedures in a Hospital: Before and After Evaluation Study.

Lucy Bray, Ashley Sharpe, Phillip Gichuru, Peter-Marc Fortune, Lucy Blake, Victoria Appleton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Mixed Reality in Clinical Settings for Pediatric Patients and Their Families: A Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. AI in pediatric surgery: a narrative review.Translational pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. A Review of Converging Technologies in eHealth Pertaining to Artificial Intelligence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lucy BrayFaculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8414-3233
Ashley SharpeFaculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4936-824X
Phillip GichuruFaculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0459-1552
Peter-Marc FortuneRoyal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7033-002X
Lucy BlakeFaculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9809-605X
Victoria AppletonFaculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7214-0702
Edge Hill University · GBRoyal Manchester Children's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is increasing interest in finding novel approaches to improve the preparation of children for hospital procedures such as surgery, x-rays, and blood tests. Well-prepared and informed children have better outcomes (less procedural anxiety and higher satisfaction). A digital therapeutic (DTx) platform (Xploro) was developed with children to provide health information through gamification, serious games, a chatbot, and an augmented reality avatar.

objectiveThis before and after evaluation study aims to assess the acceptability of the Xploro DTx and examine its impact on children and their parent's procedural knowledge, procedural anxiety, and reported experiences when attending a hospital for a planned procedure.

methodsWe used a mixed methods design with quantitative measures and qualitative data collected sequentially from a group of children who received standard hospital information (before group) and a group of children who received the DTx intervention (after group). Participants were children aged between 8 and 14 years and their parents who attended a hospital for a planned clinical procedure at a children's hospital in North West England. Children and their parents completed self-report measures (perceived knowledge, procedural anxiety, procedural satisfaction, and procedural involvement) at baseline, preprocedure, and postprocedure.

resultsA total of 80 children (n=40 standard care group and n=40 intervention group) and their parents participated in the study; the children were aged between 8 and 14 years (average 10.4, SD 2.27 years) and were attending a hospital for a range of procedures. The children in the intervention group reported significantly lower levels of procedural anxiety before the procedure than those in the standard group (two-tailed t

conclusionsThis study has shown that the DTx platform, Xploro, has a positive impact on children attending a hospital for a procedure by reducing levels of procedural anxiety. The children and parents in the intervention group described Xploro as improving their experiences and being easy and fun to use.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnxietyChildChild Health ServicesChild, HospitalizedFemaleHospitals, PediatricHumansMaleartificial intelligenceaugmented realitychildrenhealthhealth literacyprocedure

Identifiers

PMID32780025
PMCPMC7448172
OpenAlexW3036442924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.