Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32779850›Full record

ArticleInfluenza and other respiratory viruses2021

Inactivated pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza A virus human vaccines have different efficacy after homologous challenge in the ferret model.

Beatriz Vidaña, Sharon M Brookes, Helen E Everett, Fanny Garcon, Alejandro Nuñez, Othmar Engelhardt, Diane Major, Katja Hoschler, Ian H Brown, Maria Zambon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Influenza and other respiratory viruses, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Beatriz VidañaBristol Veterinary School, Faculty of Health Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1724-1006
Sharon M BrookesVirology Department, Animal and Plant Health Agency, APHA-Weybridge, Addlestone, UK.
Helen E EverettVirology Department, Animal and Plant Health Agency, APHA-Weybridge, Addlestone, UK.
Fanny GarconVirology Department, Animal and Plant Health Agency, APHA-Weybridge, Addlestone, UK.
Alejandro NuñezPathology Department, Animal and Plant Health Agency, APHA-Weybridge, Addlestone, UK.
Othmar EngelhardtNational Institute for Biological Standards and Control, Potters Bar, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0465-9908
Diane MajorNational Institute for Biological Standards and Control, Potters Bar, UK.
Katja HoschlerPublic Health England - Colindale, London, UK.
Ian H BrownVirology Department, Animal and Plant Health Agency, APHA-Weybridge, Addlestone, UK.
Maria ZambonPublic Health England - Colindale, London, UK.
Animal and Plant Health Agency · GBNational Institute for Biological Standards and Control · GBPublic Health England · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 2009 pandemic H1N1 (A(H1N1)pdm09) influenza A virus (IAV) has replaced the previous seasonal H1N1 strain in humans and continues to circulate worldwide. The comparative performance of inactivated A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza vaccines remains of considerable interest. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two licensed A(H1N1)pdm09 inactivated vaccines (AS03B adjuvanted split virion Pandemrix from GlaxoSmithKline and referred here as (V1) and non-adjuvanted whole virion Celvapan from Baxter and referred here as (V2)) in ferrets as a pre-clinical model for human disease intervention.

methodsNaïve ferrets were divided into two groups (V1 and V2) and immunised intramuscularly with two different A/California/07/2009-derived inactivated vaccines, V1 administered in a single dose and V2 administered in 2 doses separated by 21 days. Six weeks after the first immunisation, vaccinated animals and a non-vaccinated control (NVC) group were intra-nasally challenged with 10 RESULTS AND

conclusionsResults revealed important qualitative differences in the performance of both inactivated vaccines in relation to protection against challenge with a comparable virus in a naive animal (ferret) model of human disease. Vaccine V1 limited and controlled viral shedding and reduced lower respiratory tract infection. In contrast, vaccine V2 did not control infection and animals showed sustained viral shedding and delayed lower respiratory infection, resulting in pulmonary lesions, suggesting lower efficacy of V2 vaccine.

Indexed as

Influenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsAntibodies, ViralFerretsHumansVaccines, InactivatedAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntibodies, ViralInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, Inactivatedadjuvantefficacyferretimmunopathologyinfluenza Apandemic 2009 H1N1vaccine

Identifiers

PMID32779850
PMCPMC7767958
OpenAlexW3048635829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.