ReviewClinical cardiology2020
Myocardial infarction classification and its implications on measures of cardiovascular outcomes, quality, and racial/ethnic disparities.
Review in Clinical cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Body Composition Risk Assessment of All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Completing Cardiac Rehabilitation.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Characterization of Myocardial Injury With High-Sensitivity Troponin.Texas Heart Institute journal · 2023Article
- RNA-Binding Proteins as Critical Post-Transcriptional Regulators of Cardiac Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Clinical presentation and angiographic findings of acute myocardial infarction in young adults in Jazan region.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- Break the "HOLD": The Need to Strengthen the Management of Hypertension, Obesity, Lipids, and Diabetes (HOLD) and Improve Cardiovascular Health in People With Diabetes.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Reproducing extracellular matrix adverse remodelling of non-ST myocardial infarction in a large animal model.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Effect of Socio-Economic Status on Perioperative Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Pulmonary Lobectomy.Cureus · 2022Article
- Sex Differences in the Association of Body Composition and Cardiovascular Mortality.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
- Myocardial infarction classification and its implications on measures of cardiovascular outcomes, quality, and racial/ethnic disparities.Clinical cardiology · 2020Review
- Clinical Characteristics, Outcomes, and Epidemiological Trends of Patients Admitted With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Heart disease continues to be the leading cause of death in the United States, with approximately 805 000 cumulative deaths from myocardial infarctions (MI) from 2005 to 2014. Gender and racial/ethnic disparities in MI diagnoses are becoming more evident in quality review audits. Although recent changes in diagnostic codes provided an improved framework, clinically distinguishing types of MI remains a challenge. MI misdiagnoses and health disparities contribute to adverse outcomes in cardiac medicine. We conducted a literature review of relevant biomedical sources related to the classification of MI and disparities in cardiovascular care and outcomes. From the studies analyzed, African Americans and women have higher rates of mortality from MI, are more probably to be younger and present with other comorbidities and are less probably to receive novel therapies with respect to type of MI. As high-sensitivity troponin assays are adopted in the United States, implementation should account for how race and sex differences have been demonstrated in the reference range and diagnostic threshold of the newer assays. More research is needed to assess how the complexity of health disparities contributes to adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Creating dedicated medical quality teams (physicians, nurses, clinical documentation improvement specialists, and medical coders) and incorporating a plan-do-check-adjust quality improvement model are strategies that could potentially help better define and diagnose MI, reduce financial burdens due to MI misdiagnoses, reduce cardiovascular-related health disparities, and ultimately improve and save lives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.