ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2020
Genome-wide analysis of single nucleotide variants allows for robust and accurate assessment of clonal derivation in cell lines used to produce biologics.
Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Generation and characterization of a HEK293 cell line optimized for recombinant adeno-associated virus production.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of HEK293 Genomic Variability.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2026Article
- Next-generation sequencing: A powerful multi-purpose tool in cell line development for biologics production.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Genomic barcoding for clonal diversity monitoring and control in cell-based complex antibody production.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Genome-wide analysis of single nucleotide variants allows for robust and accurate assessment of clonal derivation in cell lines used to produce biologics.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A clonally derived (or "monoclonal") cell line is a cell population derived from a single progenitor cell. Clonally derived cell lines are required for many biotechnological applications. For instance, recombinant mammalian cells used to produce therapeutic proteins are expected by regulatory authorities to be clonally derived. Assurance of clonal derivation (or "clonality") is usually obtained from the characterization of the procedure used for cell cloning, for instance by assessing the success rate of single-cell sorting but not by assessing the cell line itself. We have developed a method to assess clonal derivation directly from the genetic makeup of cells. The genomic test of clonality is based on whole-genome sequencing and statistical analysis of single nucleotide variants. This approach quantifies the clonal fractions present in nonclonal samples and it provides a measure of the probability that a cell line is derived from a single cell. Upon experimental validation of the test, we show that it is highly accurate and that it can robustly detect minor clonal fractions of as little as 1% of the cell population. Moreover, we find that it is applicable to various cell line development protocols. This approach can simplify development protocols and shorten timelines while ensuring clonal derivation with high confidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.