Trial reportClinical and experimental dental research2020
Over-the-counter bite splints: A randomized controlled trial of compliance and efficacy.
Trial report in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02340663 (Preliminary Phase IV Trial Comparing the SOVA Night Guard With the Clinical Standard Acrylic Orthotic), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Preliminary Phase IV Trial Comparing the SOVA Night Guard With the Clinical Standard Acrylic Orthotic
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficiency of mixed and rigid occlusal stabilization splints: Randomized clinical trial.Brazilian oral research · 2024Trial
- Over-the-counter bite splints: A randomized controlled trial of compliance and efficacy.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2020Trial
- Diagnosis-based pathways for conservative and minimally invasive management of temporomandibular disorders: a scoping review.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2026Article
- Sleep related movement disorders in the elderly: a review of recent literature.Frontiers in sleep · 2024Review
- Managements of sleep bruxism in adult: A systematic review.The Japanese dental science review · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOcclusal splints are often used to curb the impacts of sleep bruxism (SB) on the dentition, and over-the-counter (OCT) options are becoming increasingly popular. OTC splints are usually fabricated at home by patients, but not routinely evaluated by dental professionals. It is unclear how OCT splints compare with more traditional splints that receive dental oversight.
objectivesThe present randomized controlled study tested how an OTC splint compared with a gold standard bite splint in terms of patient compliance (primary outcome) and efficacy (secondary outcomes).
methodsSixty-seven subjects were randomly assigned to receive either the OTC (SOVA, N = 35) splint or the gold standard "Michigan" bite splint (MI, N = 32), with 61 completing the study (SOVA, N = 30; MI, N = 31). OTC-splint subjects were required to fabricate their splints to clinically acceptable standards. Both groups wore the splints nightly for four months. Compliance was measured via daily diary. Efficacy outcomes evaluated stability, retention, periodontal health, night-time rhythmic masticatory muscle activity (RMMA), and material wear.
resultsOTC-splint subjects had difficulty fabricating splints to clinically acceptable standards. The number of night-time RMMA bursts was significantly greater for the OTC splint group. Compliance and all other efficacy measurements were not significantly different between-groups.
conclusionsThe results support the potential use of OTC splints for curbing the impacts of SB. However, the results strongly suggest that dentists should be actively engaged in overseeing patients' use of self-fabricated appliances. This clinical trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier number NCT02340663.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.