ArticleJapan journal of nursing science : JJNS2021
Psychometric properties of long-term care needs questionnaire for older Chinese adults with dementia.
Article in Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Psychometric properties of long-term care needs questionnaire for older Chinese adults with dementia.Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimLong-term care needs are important for older adults with dementia in the West, but they have not received enough attention from China. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of a long-term care needs instrument for older Chinese adults with dementia.
methodsA total of 1,212 older adults with dementia were recruited from five Chinese cities to complete a 30-item long-term care needs questionnaire. The reliability and validity of the questionnaire was evaluated using multiple assessments, including a content validity assessment, Cronbach's alpha, an item-to-total correlation test, and exploratory factor analysis.
resultsThe questionnaire was divided into four sub-sections: life care services (eight items), basic and specialist care services (12 items), mental comfort psychological services (four items), and homecare support services (six items). Cronbach's alpha was .93 for the whole questionnaire and ranged from .83 to .92 for the four sub-questionnaires. The item-to-total correlation coefficients for the four sub-questionnaires were between .68 and .88, and the test-retest correlation coefficient was .88.
conclusionOur results validated the reliability and validity of a questionnaire designed to measure the quality of long-term care services for older Chinese adults with dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.