Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32779132›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2021

Robotic hepatic parenchymal transection: a two-surgeon technique using ultrasonic dissection and irrigated bipolar coagulation.

Antoine Camerlo, Cloé Magallon, Charles Vanbrugghe, Laurent Chiche, Chloé Gaudon, Yves Rinaldi, Régis Fara

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Possibilities and limits of robotic liver surgery - Current status 2020].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Antoine CamerloDepartment of Digestive Surgery Hôpital Européen, 6 rue désirée Clary, 13003, Marseille, France. camerlo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3502-6468
Cloé MagallonDepartment of Digestive Surgery Hôpital Européen, 6 rue désirée Clary, 13003, Marseille, France.
Charles VanbruggheDepartment of Digestive Surgery Hôpital Européen, 6 rue désirée Clary, 13003, Marseille, France.
Laurent ChicheDepartment of Clinical Research Hôpital Européen, 6 rue désirée Clary, 13003, Marseille, France.
Chloé GaudonDepartment of Radiology Hôpital Européen, 6 rue désirée Clary, 13003, Marseille, France.
Yves RinaldiDepartment of Digestive Surgery Hôpital Européen, 6 rue désirée Clary, 13003, Marseille, France.
Régis FaraDepartment of Digestive Surgery Hôpital Européen, 6 rue désirée Clary, 13003, Marseille, France.
Hôpital Européen · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver transection is the most challenging part of hepatectomy due to the risk of hemorrhage which is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality and reduced long-term survival. Parenchymal ultrasonic dissection (UD) with bipolar coagulation (BPC) has been widely recognized as a safe, effective, and standard technique during open and laparoscopic hepatectomy. We here introduce our technique of robotic liver transection using UD with BPC and report on short-term perioperative outcomes. From a single-institution prospective liver surgery database, we identified patients who underwent robotic liver resection. Demographic, anesthetic, perioperative, and oncologic data were analyzed. Fifty patients underwent robotic liver resection using UD and BPC for liver malignancies (n = 42) and benign lesions (n = 8). The median age of the patients was 67 years and 28 were male. According to the difficulty scoring system, 60% (n = 30) of liver resection were considered difficult. Three cases (6%) were converted to open surgery. The median operative time was 240 min, and the median estimated blood loss was 200 ml; 2 patients required operative transfusions. The overall complication rate was 38% (grade I, 29; grade II, 15; grade III, 3; grade IV, 1). Seven patients (14%) experienced biliary leakage. The median length of hospital stay post-surgery was 7 (range 3-20) days. The R0 resection rate was 92%. Robotic parenchymal transection using UD and irrigated BPC appears a simple, safe, and effective technique. However, our results must be confirmed in larger series or in randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyLiver NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgeonsAgedBlood Loss, SurgicalDissectionHepatectomyHumansLiverMaleProspective StudiesUltrasonicsBipolar coagulationHepatectomyLiver transectionRoboticUltrasonic dissection

Identifiers

PMID32779132
OpenAlexW3048930754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.