Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32779089›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2021

Pediatric Consultation-Liaison: Patient Characteristics and Considerations for Training in Evidence-Based Practices.

Amanda A Bowling, Sarah Kate Bearman, Weixi Wang, Leslie A Guzman, Eric Daleiden

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amanda A BowlingDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, 1912 Speedway STE 504, Austin, TX, 78712-1289, USA. amandabowling@utexas.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6408-2477
Sarah Kate BearmanDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, 1912 Speedway STE 504, Austin, TX, 78712-1289, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4920-1124
Weixi WangDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, 1912 Speedway STE 504, Austin, TX, 78712-1289, USA.
Leslie A GuzmanDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, 1912 Speedway STE 504, Austin, TX, 78712-1289, USA.
Eric DaleidenPracticeWise, LLC, Satellite Beach, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consultation-liaison services are an integral part of many pediatric hospital settings, yet characteristics of this patient population have not been extensively documented. The current study is a retrospective one-year chart review of the consultation-liaison service at a large pediatric hospital in the Southwestern United States. The purpose of this study is twofold: (1) to characterize this hospital's CL population and (2) to use these characteristics to identify preliminary evidence-based practices that should be considered for CL provider training. Identifying evidence-based practice elements that align with the characteristics of consultation-liaison patient populations may inform trainings for consultation-liaison staff. This would help to ensure that youth seen in hospital consultation-liaison services are getting the best available services, which is critical given the shortened time frame available to work with this patient population.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeReferral and ConsultationAdolescentChildHumansRetrospective StudiesConsultation-liaison provider trainingEvidence-based practice elementsPediatric consultation-liaisonPediatric patient characteristics

Identifiers

PMID32779089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.