ReviewChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2020
Evaluation of 2011 AAP cervical spine screening guidelines for children with Down Syndrome.
Review in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiological Screening of Atlantoaxial Instability in Children with Trisomy 21: A Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Recommendations.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Pediatric cervical spine instability: evolving concepts.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024Review
- Grisel's syndrome and Down syndrome: a case report.International journal of burns and trauma · 2023Article
- Atlantoaxial subluxation and Down syndrome: A cross-sectional analysis.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAtlantoaxial instability (AAI) has a higher incidence rate among individuals with Down syndrome (DS) than the non-DS population. In 2011, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) updated its AAI screening guidelines for children with DS from radiographic screening to radiographs only if there are clinical symptoms suggestive of cervical spine pathology. An assessment of whether this alteration has been associated with an increase in AAI-associated spinal cord injury has not been undertaken.
methodsWe provide the first neurosurgical review of a large experience implementing the 2011 AAP guidelines. We reviewed the courses of patients with DS seen at the Sie Center for Down Syndrome at Children's Hospital Colorado who were evaluated for cervical spine disease and determined whether screening radiographic imaging could have led to earlier diagnosis or prevented development of neurological deficits. We also report an illustrative case of a 5-year-old female with Down syndrome who presented with instability after normal screening radiographs per the pre-2011 guidelines.
resultsThe clinical experience of the Sie Center demonstrates that even when limiting imaging to patients who show signs or symptoms of spine pathology, the vast majority of x-rays are negative. Our exemplary patient presented to the emergency department for neck pain without a history of significant trauma. She was diagnosed and treated for atlantoaxial subluxation associated with os odontoideum.
conclusionRoutine radiographic screening may not be sufficiently predictive of DS individuals at risk to develop AAI. This experience supports the appositeness of the de-escalation of care asserted by the guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.