ArticleNature protocols2020
Direct analysis of brain phenotypes via neural blastocyst complementation.
Article in Nature protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Generation of parathyroid glands from pluripotent stem cells.Endocrine journal · 2025Review
- Article
- Derivation of Thyroid Follicular Cells From Pluripotent Stem Cells: Insights From Development and Implications for Regenerative Medicine.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Review
- Article
- Transplanting Microglia for Treating CNS Injuries and Neurological Diseases and Disorders, and Prospects for Generating Exogenic Microglia.Cell transplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We provide a protocol for generating forebrain structures in vivo from mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) via neural blastocyst complementation (NBC). We developed this protocol for studies of development and function of specific forebrain regions, including the cerebral cortex and hippocampus. We describe a complete workflow, from methods for modifying a given genomic locus in ESCs via CRISPR-Cas9-mediated editing to the generation of mouse chimeras with ESC-reconstituted forebrain regions that can be directly analyzed. The procedure begins with genetic editing of mouse ESCs via CRISPR-Cas9, which can be accomplished in ~4-8 weeks. We provide protocols to achieve fluorescent labeling of ESCs in ~2-3 weeks, which allows tracing of the injected, ESC-derived donor cells in chimeras generated via NBC. Once modified ESCs are ready, NBC chimeras are generated in ~3 weeks via injection of ESCs into genetically programmed blastocysts that are subsequently transferred into pseudo-pregnant fosters. Our in vivo brain organogenesis platform is efficient, allowing functional and systematic analysis of genes and other genomic factors in as little as 3 months, in the context of a whole organism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.