Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32778801›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2020

Cultural influences on word meanings revealed through large-scale semantic alignment.

Bill Thompson, Seán G Roberts, Gary Lupyan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. When languages favour complex words.Nature human behaviour · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Water Is and Is Not HCognitive science · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Semantic Anchors Facilitate Task Encoding in Continual Learning.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Word reuse and combination support efficient communication of emerging concepts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Neural Representations of Concreteness and Concrete Concepts Are Specific to the Individual.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. TACO: A Turkish database for abstract concepts.Behavior research methods · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bill ThompsonDepartment of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA. wdt@princeton.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7348-3531
Seán G RobertsSchool of English, Communication and Philosophy, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5990-9161
Gary LupyanDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8441-7433

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

If the structure of language vocabularies mirrors the structure of natural divisions that are universally perceived, then the meanings of words in different languages should closely align. By contrast, if shared word meanings are a product of shared culture, history and geography, they may differ between languages in substantial but predictable ways. Here, we analysed the semantic neighbourhoods of 1,010 meanings in 41 languages. The most-aligned words were from semantic domains with high internal structure (number, quantity and kinship). Words denoting natural kinds, common actions and artefacts aligned much less well. Languages that are more geographically proximate, more historically related and/or spoken by more-similar cultures had more aligned word meanings. These results provide evidence that the meanings of common words vary in ways that reflect the culture, history and geography of their users.

Indexed as

CulturePsycholinguisticsSemanticsGeographyHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.