Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32778772›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2021

A prospective study analyzing both inflation and deflation preference for commonly available inflatable penile prostheses.

Vinayak Madhusoodanan, Jordan Best, Karthik Kalahasty, Ruben Blachman-Braun, Laura Horodyski, John M Masterson, Ranjith Ramasamy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of impotence research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vinayak MadhusoodananDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. vmkodoth@med.miami.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5499-7876
Jordan BestDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2364-6627
Karthik KalahastyDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Ruben Blachman-BraunDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Laura HorodyskiDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
John M MastersonDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0388-1670
Ranjith RamasamyDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1387-7904

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite popularity, satisfaction rates of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) use can be improved by evaluating the ability to operate devices in the preoperative setting. The purpose of this study was to prospectively analyze the preference of three commonly available IPPs. In total, 125 IPP-naïve men 60 years of age or older were prospectively recruited from an outpatient Urology clinic from June 2019 to January 2020. A questionnaire standardized to all encounters was utilized to collect demographics, selected medical information, and key pinch strength. Participants were then asked to rank three models in terms of preference (from 1 to 3, 1 representing most preferred) for each inflation and deflation in a double-blinded manner. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA, a Chi-square test and multivariable logistical regression analysis. The results demonstrated preference for Coloplast Titan (44%) for inflation, and preference for AMS 700 (40%) for deflation. Men who preferred the Coloplast Titan inflation had a lower chance of preferring the AMS 700 MS deflation (OR = 0.29; p = 0.010) and Coloplast Titan Touch deflation (OR = 0.27; p = 0.012). Preference for Coloplast Titan was weakly associated with participant history of coronary artery disease (OR = 5.96, p = 0.006) and osteoarthritis (OR = 3.04, p = 0.044). Neither key pinch strength nor age was associated with preference for a particular model. IPP-naïve men over 60 years favor Coloplast Titan for inflation and AMS 700 for deflation, and men who preferred the Coloplast Titan for inflation were less likely to choose the AMS 700 MS or Coloplast Titan Touch for deflation. Further studies should aim to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Penile ImplantationPenile ProsthesisAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.