Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32778738›Full record

ReviewEye (London, England)2020

Cataract management in children: a review of the literature and current practice across five large UK centres.

J E Self, R Taylor, A L Solebo, S Biswas, M Parulekar, A Dev Borman, J Ashworth, R McClenaghan, J Abbott, E O'Flynn and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Examination under anesthesia: Preferred Practice.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

J E SelfDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK. j.e.self@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1030-9963
R TaylorDepartment of Medical Genetics, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1235-4303
A L SoleboGreat Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.
S BiswasManchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, UK.
M ParulekarBirmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
A Dev BormanGreat Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.
J AshworthManchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, UK.
R McClenaghanDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
J AbbottBirmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
E O'FlynnDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
D HildebrandOxford Eye Hospital, Oxford, UK.
I C LloydGreat Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital and childhood cataracts are uncommon but regularly seen in the clinics of most paediatric ophthalmology teams in the UK. They are often associated with profound visual loss and a large proportion have a genetic aetiology, some with significant extra-ocular comorbidities. Optimal diagnosis and treatment typically require close collaboration within multidisciplinary teams. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment. A variety of surgical techniques, timings of intervention and options for optical correction have been advocated making management seem complex for those seeing affected children infrequently. This paper summarises the proceedings of two recent RCOphth paediatric cataract study days, provides a literature review and describes the current UK 'state of play' in the management of paediatric cataracts.

Indexed as

CataractCataract ExtractionOphthalmologyChildHumansUnited KingdomVision Disorders

Identifiers

PMID32778738
PMCPMC7784951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.