ArticleScientific reports2020
DNA barcodes for delineating Clerodendrum species of North East India.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative plastome analyses and phylogenetic insights ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- High species discrimination inPlant diversity · 2025Article
- DNA-Barcoding for Cultivar Identification and Intraspecific Diversity Analysis of Agricultural Crops.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Species-specific RNA barcoding technology for rapid and accurate identification of four types of influenza virus.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- RNA barcode segments for SARS-CoV-2 identification from HCoVs and SARSr-CoV-2 lineages.Virologica Sinica · 2024Article
- Deciphering dengue: novel RNA barcoding segments for enhanced serotype-specific identification and global surveillance of dengue viruses.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Conserved chloroplast genome sequences of the genus Clerodendrum Linn. (Lamiaceae) as a super-barcode.PloS one · 2023Article
- A novel approach for audible acoustic quick response codes.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The specific DNA barcodes based on chloroplast genes for species identification ofPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2022Article
- DNA barcoding and genetic fidelity assessment of micropropagatedPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diversified genus of Clerodendrum with its complex evolutionary history leads to taxonomic mystification. Unlike traditional taxonomic methods, DNA barcoding could be a promising tool for the identification and conservation of Clerodendrum species. This study was attempted to develop an efficient barcode locus in Clerodendrum species of North East India. We evaluated four barcode candidates (ITS2, matK, rbcL, ycf1) and its combinations in different Clerodendrum species. The reliability of barcodes to distinguish the species were calculated using genetic pairwise distances, intra- and inter-specific diversity, barcode gap, and phylogenetic tree-based methods. The results exemplify that matK posse's maximum number of variables and parsimony-informative sites (103/100), intra- (0.021 ± 0.001) and inter- (0.086 ± 0.005) specific divergences and species resolution rate (89.1%) followed by ITS2, ycf1, and rbcL. Among the combinatorial locus, ITS2 + matK showed the best species discrimination with distinctive barcode gaps. Therefore, we tentatively suggest that the combination of ITS2 + matK as core barcode for Clerodendrum and converted into quick response (QR) code. Hence, this finding indicates that DNA barcoding could provide consistent resources for species discrimination and resolve taxonomic controversies of the genus as well as set a preliminary assessment toward its biodiversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.