Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32778602›Full record

ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2020

Use of the Population Grouping Methodology of the Canadian Institute for Health Information to predict high-cost health system users in Ontario.

Sharada Weir, Mitch Steffler, Yin Li, Shaun Shaikh, James G Wright, Jasmin Kantarevic

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Can patient-reported data improve predictions about who will be a high-need, high-cost patient in British Columbia?Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Trends in prevalence of chronic disease and multimorbidity in Ontario, Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021
    Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sharada WeirEconomics, Policy and Research, Ontario Medical Association, Toronto, Ont. sharada.weir@oma.org.
Mitch StefflerEconomics, Policy and Research, Ontario Medical Association, Toronto, Ont.
Yin LiEconomics, Policy and Research, Ontario Medical Association, Toronto, Ont.
Shaun ShaikhEconomics, Policy and Research, Ontario Medical Association, Toronto, Ont.
James G WrightEconomics, Policy and Research, Ontario Medical Association, Toronto, Ont.
Jasmin KantarevicEconomics, Policy and Research, Ontario Medical Association, Toronto, Ont.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior research has consistently shown that the heaviest users account for a disproportionate share of health care costs. As such, predicting high-cost users may be a precondition for cost containment. We evaluated the ability of a new health risk predictive modelling tool, which was developed by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), to identify future high-cost cases.

methodsWe ran the CIHI model using administrative health care data for Ontario (fiscal years 2014/15 and 2015/16) to predict the risk, for each individual in the study population, of being a high-cost user 1 year in the future. We also estimated actual costs for the prediction period. We evaluated model performance for selected percentiles of cost based on the discrimination and calibration of the model.

resultsA total of 11 684 427 individuals were included in the analysis. Overall, 10% of this population had annual costs exceeding $3050 per person in fiscal year 2016/17, accounting for 71.6% of total expenditures; 5% had costs above $6374 (58.2% of total expenditures); and 1% exceeded $22 995 (30.5% of total expenditures). Model performance increased with higher cost thresholds. The c-statistic was 0.78 (reasonable), 0.81 (strong) and 0.86 (very strong) at the 10%, 5% and 1% cost thresholds, respectively.

interpretationThe CIHI Population Grouping Methodology was designed to predict the average user of health care services, yet performed adequately for predicting high-cost users. Although we recommend the development of a purpose-designed tool to improve model performance, the existing CIHI Population Grouping Methodology may be used - as is or in concert with additional information - for many applications requiring prediction of future high-cost users.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseDatabases, FactualFemaleHealth Care CostsHealth ServicesHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID32778602
PMCPMC7829019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.