Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32778165›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2020

Early response assessment and prediction of overall survival after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

Daphne M V Huizing, Else A Aalbersberg, Michelle W J Versleijen, Margot E T Tesselaar, Iris Walraven, Max J Lahaye, Berlinda J de Wit-van der Veen, Marcel P M Stokkel

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Baseline body composition and early PRRT outcome in GEP-NETs: an exploratory analysis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Role ofFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Prediction of [EJNMMI physics · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. How to design a theranostic trial?Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England) · 2024
    Review
  15. Prediction ofCancers · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daphne M V HuizingDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. d.huizing@nki.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1967-8148
Else A AalbersbergDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4910-3794
Michelle W J VersleijenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Margot E T TesselaarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Iris WalravenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Max J LahayeDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8444-202X
Berlinda J de Wit-van der VeenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7860-2904
Marcel P M StokkelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResponse after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) can be evaluated using anatomical imaging (CT/MRI), somatostatin receptor imaging ([

methodsImaging and CgA levels were acquired prior to start of PRRT, and 3 and 9 months after completion. Tumour size was measured on anatomical imaging and response was categorized according to RECIST 1.1 and Choi criteria. [

resultsA total of 44 patients were included, with median follow-up of 31 months (IQR 26-36 months) and median OS of 39 months (IQR 32mo-not reached)d. Progressive disease after 9 months (according to RECIST 1.1) was significantly associated with worse OS compared to stable disease [HR 9.04 (95% CI 2.10-38.85)], however not compared to patients with partial response. According to Choi criteria, progressive disease was also significantly associated with worse OS compared to stable disease [HR 6.10 (95% CI 1.38-27.05)] and compared to patients with partial response [HR 22.66 (95% CI 2.33-219.99)]. In some patients, new lesions were detected earlier with [

conclusionsProgression on anatomical imaging performed 9 months after PRRT is associated with worse OS compared to stable disease or partial response. Although new lesions were detected earlier with [

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsOrganometallic CompoundsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsSurvival Analysisgallium Ga 68 dotatateOrganometallic CompoundsRadiopharmaceuticals[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CTPRRTRECIST 1.1SurvivalTherapy response

Identifiers

PMID32778165
PMCPMC7418334
OpenAlexW3048514836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.