Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32778164›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2020

Multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation improves the long-term functional status of geriatric hip-fracture patients.

Daniel Pfeufer, Christian Kammerlander, Christian Stadler, Tobias Roth, Michael Blauth, Carl Neuerburg, Wolfgang Böcker, Christian Zeckey, Monika Lechleitner, Markus Gosch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Research progress on treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients with bone cement type femoral head replacement].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Orthogeriatric co-management: differences in outcome between major and minor fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel PfeuferDepartment of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany. Daniel.Pfeufer@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6780-3316
Christian KammerlanderDepartment of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christian StadlerDepartment of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.
Tobias RothDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Michael BlauthDepuy Synthes, Luzernstrasse 21, 4528, Zuchwil, Switzerland.
Carl NeuerburgDepartment of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.
Wolfgang BöckerDepartment of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christian ZeckeyDepartment of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.
Monika LechleitnerDepartment for Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Hospital Hochzirl, Zirl, Austria.
Markus GoschDepartment of Medicine 2/Geriatrics, Paracelsus Medical University, General Hospital Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEInnsbruck Medical University · ATNuremberg Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the world population ages, the number of hip-related fractures in the elderly is steadily increasing. These fractures generate a major worldwide healthcare problem and frequently lead to deterioration of life quality, mobility and independence in activity of daily life of geriatric patients. At present, many studies have investigated and proved benefits of multidisciplinary orthogeriatric care for elderly hip-fracture patients. Only few studies however, have analyzed treatment concepts for those patients directly following discharge from hospital in specialized rehabilitation centers. The aim of this study was to evaluate effects of a multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation on the short- and long-term functional status of geriatric patients who suffered from hip fracture.

methodsA total of 161 hip-fracture patients aged 80 years and above, or additionally 70 years and above suffering from age-typical multimorbidity were included in this study. Patients who had an initial Barthel Index lower than 30 points were excluded from this study, as most of these patients were not able to attend a therapy at the rehabilitation center due to a poor functional status. The patients were separated into two subgroups dependent on the availability of treatment spots at the rehabilitation center. No other item was used to discriminate between the groups. Group A (n = 95) stayed an average of 21 days at an inpatient rehabilitation center that specialized in geriatric patients. Group B (n = 66) underwent the standard postoperative treatment and were sent home with further treatment by their general practitioner, nursing staff and physiotherapists. To evaluate the patients' functional status over the course of time we used the Barthel Index, which was evaluated for every patient on the day of discharge, as well as during checkups after 3, 6 and 12 months.

resultsThe average Barthel Index at the day of discharge was 57.79 ± 14.92 points for Group A and 56.82 ± 18.76 points for Group B (p = 0.431). After 3 months, the average Barthel Index was 82.43 points for Group A and 73.11 points for group B (p = 0.005). In the 6-month checkup Group A's average Barthel Index was 83.95 points and Group B's was 74.02 points (p = 0.002). After 12 months, patients from Group A had an average Barthel Index of 81.21 while patients from Group B had an average Barthel Index of 69.85 (p = 0.005).

conclusionThe results of this study reveal a significantly better outcome concerning both, short-term and long-term functional status after 3, 6 and 12 months for geriatric hip-fracture patients, who underwent an inpatient treatment in a rehabilitation center following the initial therapy.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRecovery of FunctionAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHip FracturesHumansInpatientsInterdisciplinary CommunicationMalePatient Care TeamPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesGeriatric patientsHip fractureOrthogeriatric care

Identifiers

PMID32778164
PMCPMC7418419
OpenAlexW3048902373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.