Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32778146›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2020

Effect of dexmedetomidine on inflammation in patients with sepsis requiring mechanical ventilation: a sub-analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical trial.

Yoshinori Ohta, Kyohei Miyamoto, Yu Kawazoe, Hitoshi Yamamura, Takeshi Morimoto

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01760967 phase4completednot on this map

Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Mortality, Duration of Mechanical Ventilation and Multi-organ Function in Sepsis Patients Under Lighter Sedation by Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWakayama Medical UniversityRan2013 to 2016Enrolled203ConditionsSepsisArmsDexmedetomidine
NCT06169475 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Dexmedetomidine vs Esmolol or Placebo on Cerebral Hemodynamics in Septic Shock: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorXinchen WangRan2020 to 2023Enrolled14ConditionsSeptic Shock, Stress Response, Cerebral HemodynamicsArmsDexmedetomidine Hydrochloride, Esmolol Hydrochloride
NCT07073846 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Lidocaine-Dexmedetomidine Combination Therapy in Reducing Post-Operative Pain, Inflammatory Response, and Oxidative Stress in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialRan2025 to 2027Enrolled104ConditionsMorbid Obesity Requiring Bariatric Surgery, Postoperative Pain, Postoperative Pain Management, Postoperative AnalgesiaArmsIntravenous Lidocaine infusion + Standard Anesthesia, Intravenous Dexmedetomidine infusion + Standard Anesthesia, Lidocaine + Dexmedetomidine Combination (LIDEX) + Standard Anesthesia, 0.9 % Saline Placebo + Standard Anesthesia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sympathetic regulation of the host immune response to bacterial sepsis.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Combining OJournal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2024
    Review
  18. Organ crosstalk and dysfunction in sepsis.Annals of intensive care · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshinori OhtaEducation and Training Center for Students and Professionals in Healthcare, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Kyohei MiyamotoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Yu KawazoeDivision of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Hitoshi YamamuraOsaka Prefectural Nakakawachi Emergency and Critical Care Center, Higashiosaka, Japan.
Takeshi MorimotoDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan. morimoto@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-6844-739X
Hyogo Medical University · JPTohoku University · JPWakayama Medical University · JP

Funding

Hospira NAJapan Society for the Promotion of Science JP15K21535Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP17689022Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP17K09252Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP21659130Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP22390103Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP23659256Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP25860484Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP26293159Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP) JP20K07839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdministration of dexmedetomidine has been reported to improve inflammatory response in animals. We explored the effects of administering dexmedetomidine on the levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin, and thus on inflammation, in patients with sepsis enrolled in a randomized clinical trial.

methodsThe DESIRE trial was a multicenter randomized clinical trial in which adult patients with sepsis were sedated with (DEX group) or without (non-DEX group) dexmedetomidine while on mechanical ventilators. As a prespecified sub-analysis, we compared CRP and procalcitonin levels during the first 14 days of treatment between the two groups. The 14-day mortality rate, albumin level, and the number of patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) were also assessed. We used generalized linear models to estimate the differences in these outcomes between groups. We also used the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate the 14-day mortality rate and the log-rank test to assess between-group differences.

resultsOur study comprised 201 patients: 100 in the DEX group and 101 in the non-DEX group. CRP and procalcitonin levels were lower in the DEX vs. non-DEX group during the 14-day treatment period [CRP-range, 5.6-20.3 vs. 8.3-21.1 mg/dL (P = 0.03); procalcitonin-range, 1.2-37.4 vs. 1.7-52.9 ng/mL (P = 0.04)]. Albumin levels were higher in the DEX group (range, 2.3-2.6 g/dL) than in the non-DEX group (range, 2.1-2.7 g/dL; P = 0.01). The percentage of patients with DIC did not significantly differ between the groups (range, 21-59% and 17-56% for the DEX and non-DEX groups, respectively; P = 0.49). The 14-day mortality rates in the DEX and non-DEX groups were 13 and 21%, respectively (P = 0.16).

conclusionSedation using dexmedetomidine reduced inflammation in patients with sepsis requiring mechanical ventilation.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01760967 . Registered on 4 January 2013.

Indexed as

Respiration, ArtificialAgedC-Reactive ProteinDexmedetomidineFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesInflammationMaleMiddle AgedProcalcitoninSepsisTreatment OutcomeC-Reactive ProteinDexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesProcalcitoninC-reactive proteinDexmedetomidineInflammationProcalcitoninSepsis

Identifiers

PMID32778146
PMCPMC7416813
OpenAlexW3047955255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.