Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32778118›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2020

Feasibility and potential effects of using the electro-dress Mollii on spasticity and functioning in chronic stroke.

Susanne Palmcrantz, Gaia Valentina Pennati, Hanna Bergling, Jörgen Borg

6 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04076878 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Using the Electrodress Mollii to Reduce Spasticity and Enhance Functioning After Stroke.

TypeinterventionalSponsorDanderyd HospitalRan2017 to 2019Enrolled21ConditionsSpasticity, Muscle, Stroke, Electric Stimulation TherapyArmsMollii
NCT04632186 naunknown statusnot on this map

Development of an Electronic Suit to Reduce Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorDanderyd HospitalRan2020 to 2022Enrolled15ConditionsStroke, Pain, Shoulder, Technology, TherapeuticsArmsEXOPULSE Mollii suit
NCT05857280 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of EXOPULSE Mollii Suit on Motor Functions in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis (EXOSEP 2)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSheikh Shakhbout Medical CityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled36ConditionsSclerosis, Multiple, MS (Multiple Sclerosis), Spasticity, Muscle, SpasticArmsEXOPULSE Mollii Suit Stimulation
NCT05912595 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of EXOPULSE Mollii Suit on Spasticity and Muscular Oxygenation in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis.

TypeinterventionalSponsorSheikh Shakhbout Medical CityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled36ConditionsSclerosis, Multiple, MS (Multiple Sclerosis), Spastic, Spasticity, MuscleArmsEXOPULSE Mollii Suit Stimulation
NCT06214975 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of EXOPULSE Mollii Suit on Motor Functions in Patients With Stroke (EXOSTROKE 2)"

TypeinterventionalSponsorSheikh Shakhbout Medical CityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled36ConditionsStroke, Spasticity, Muscle, SpasticArmsEXOPULSE Mollii Suit Stimulation
NCT07202195 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Home-Based Neuromodulation Suits for Reducing Spasticity and Ataxia in Multiple Sclerosis: A Multi-center RCT

TypeinterventionalSponsorDaphne KosRan2026 to 2027Enrolled70ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, MS (Multiple Sclerosis), Spasticity With Multiple Sclerosis, Ataxia - OtherArmselectro-stimulation suit, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Home-Based Gait Interventions for Adults with Stroke: A Scoping Review.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Acute Effects of a Session with The EXOPULSE Mollii Suit in a Fibromyalgia Patient: A Case Report.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susanne PalmcrantzKarolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Entrévagen 8, SE-182 88, Stockholm, Sweden. susanne.palmcrantz@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5337-2092
Gaia Valentina PennatiKarolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Entrévagen 8, SE-182 88, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hanna BerglingKarolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Entrévagen 8, SE-182 88, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jörgen BorgKarolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Entrévagen 8, SE-182 88, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpasticity after lesions of central motor pathways may be disabling and there is a need for new, cost-effective treatment methods. One novel approach is offered by the electro-dress Mollii®, primarily designed to enhance reciprocal inhibition of spastic muscles by multifocal, transcutaneous antagonist stimulation.

methodsThe Mollii® suit was set individually for 20 participants living with spasticity and hemiplegia after stroke and used in the home setting for 6 weeks. Usability and perceived effects were monitored by weekly telephone interviews. Outcome was assessed by use of the NeuroFlexor™ method for quantification of the neural component (NC) of resistance to passive stretch (spasticity), and the modified Ashworth scale (MAS) for total resistance, Fugl-Meyer Assessment of motor recovery for sensorimotor function in upper (FM-UE) and lower extremities (FM-LE), activity performance with the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Berg balance scale, 10 m and 6 min walk tests, and perceived functioning with the Stroke Impact Scale.

resultsCompliance was high (mean 19.25 of 21 sessions). Perceived positive effects were reported by 60% and most commonly related to decreased muscle tone (n = 9), improved gait pattern function (n = 7) and voluntary movement in the upper extremity (n = 6). On a group level, the NC decreased significantly in the wrist flexors of the affected hand (p = 0.023) and significant improvements according to FM-UE (p = 0.000) and FM-LE (p = 0.003) were seen after the intervention. No significant difference was detected with MAS or assessed activity performance, except for the ARAT (p = 0.000). FM-UE score change correlated significantly and fairly with the perceived effect in the upper extremity (r 0.498 p = 0.025) and in the corresponding analysis for the FM-LE and perceived effect in the lower extremity (r = 0.469 p = 0.037).

conclusionThis study indicates that the Mollii® method is feasible when used in the home setting to decrease spasticity and improve sensorimotor function. The results may guide a larger controlled study combined with rehabilitation interventions to enhance effects on activity and participation domains.

trial registrationNCT04076878 . Registered 2 September 2019 - Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Wearable Electronic DevicesAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle SpasticityStrokeStroke RehabilitationTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationTreatment OutcomeClinical assessmentsHome settingOutcomeSelf-administeredSelf-perceivedSpasticityStroke

Identifiers

PMID32778118
PMCPMC7419224
OpenAlexW3048880384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.