Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32777778›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2020

Quantitative comparisons of block thresholds and onset responses for charge-balanced kilohertz frequency waveforms.

Edgar Peña, Nicole A Pelot, Warren M Grill

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edgar PeñaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3148-8355
Nicole A PelotDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2844-0190
Warren M GrillDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5240-6588
Duke University · US

Funding

Modeling Activation and Block of Autonomic Nerves for Analysis and DesignOT2OD025340 · OD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GRILL, WARREN M. · 2017 to 2021
$5.9M
Optimized Electrical Block of Peripheral NervesR01NS126376 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Warren M. Grill · 2023 to 2026
$2.0M
NIH HHS OT2 OD025340NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS126376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere is growing interest in delivering kilohertz frequency (KHF) electrical signals to block conduction in peripheral nerves for treatment of various diseases. Previous studies used different KHF waveforms to achieve block, and it remains unclear how waveform affects nerve block parameters. APPROACH: We quantified the effects of waveform on KHF block of the rat tibial nerve in vivo and in computational models. We compared block thresholds and onset responses across current-controlled sinusoids and charge-balanced rectangular waveforms with different asymmetries and duty cycles. MAIN

resultsSine waves had higher block thresholds than square waves, but used less power at block threshold. Block threshold had an inverse relationship with duty cycle of rectangular waveforms irrespective of waveform asymmetry. Computational model results were consistent with relationships measured in vivo, although the models underestimated the effect of duty cycle on increasing thresholds. The axonal membrane substantially filtered waveforms, the filter transfer function was strikingly similar across waveforms, and filtering resulted in post-filtered rms block thresholds that were approximately constant across waveforms in silico and in vivo. Onset response was not consistently affected by waveform shape, but onset response was smaller at amplitudes well above block threshold. Therefore, waveforms with lower block thresholds (e.g. sine waves or square waves) could be more readily increased to higher amplitudes relative to block threshold to reduce onset response. We also observed a reduction in onset responses across consecutive trials after initial application of supra-block threshold amplitudes. SIGNIFICANCE: Waveform had substantial effects on block thresholds, and the amplitude relative to block threshold had substantial effects on onset response. These data inform choice of waveform in subsequent studies and clinical applications, enhance effective use of block in therapeutic applications, and facilitate the design of parameters that achieve block with minimal onset responses.

Indexed as

Nerve BlockNeural ConductionAnimalsAxonsElectric StimulationPeripheral NervesRats

Identifiers

PMID32777778
PMCPMC7742218
OpenAlexW3048383193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.