Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32777735›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2020

Isocitrate dehydrogenase variants in cancer - Cellular consequences and therapeutic opportunities.

Shuang Liu, Tom Cadoux-Hudson, Christopher J Schofield

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shuang LiuChemistry Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, 12 Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3TA, UK.
Tom Cadoux-HudsonChemistry Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, 12 Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3TA, UK.
Christopher J SchofieldChemistry Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, 12 Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3TA, UK. Electronic address: christopher.schofield@chem.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GBMansfield University · US

Funding

Cancer Research UKWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abnormal metabolism is common in cancer cells and often correlates with mutations in genes encoding for enzymes involved in small-molecule metabolism. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) is the most frequently mutated metabolic gene in cancer. Cancer-associated substitutions in IDH1 and IDH2 impair wild-type production of 2-oxoglutarate and reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) from isocitrate and oxidised nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP

Indexed as

AnimalsEnzyme InhibitorsGlutaratesHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseKetoglutaric AcidsModels, MolecularNADPNeoplasmsalpha-hydroxyglutarateEnzyme InhibitorsGlutaratesIDH1 protein, humanIDH2 protein, humanIsocitrate DehydrogenaseKetoglutaric AcidsNADP2-Hydroxyglutarate2-oxoglutarateAcute myeloid leukaemiaAlpha-ketoglutarateCancer metabolismEpigeneticsGliomaHypoxia-inducible factorIsocitrate dehydrogenaseJmjC demethylase

Identifiers

PMID32777735
PMCPMC7487778
OpenAlexW3048211865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.