Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32777589›Full record

ArticleVision research2020

Effects of low intensity ambient lighting on refractive development in infant rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Zhihui She, Li-Fang Hung, Baskar Arumugam, Krista M Beach, Earl L Smith

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mesopic Illumination in Natural Environments: Implications for Myopia Research.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  4. Light intensity and light/dark cycles regulate refractive development and myopia in mice through circadian rhythm-related genes.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Optical and Visual Diet in Myopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. GABABiomolecules · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhihui SheCollege of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Li-Fang HungCollege of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States; Brien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Baskar ArumugamCollege of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Krista M BeachCollege of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Earl L SmithCollege of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States; Brien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: esmith@uh.edu.
University of Houston · USBrien Holden Vision Institute · AU

Funding

Research Programming ModuleP30EY007551 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI VALLABH E DAS · 1988 to 2026
$16.4M
Optically Induced AnisometropiasR01EY003611 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI Lisa A Ostrin · 1985 to 2026
$11.1M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY007551NEI NIH HHS R01 EY003611
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies in chickens suggest low intensity ambient lighting causes myopia. The purpose of this experiment was to examine the effects of low intensity ambient lighting (dim light) on normal refractive development in macaque monkeys. Seven infant rhesus monkeys were reared under dim light (room illumination level: ~55 lx) from 24 to ~310 days of age with otherwise unrestricted vision. Refractive error, corneal power, ocular axial dimensions, and choroidal thickness were measured in anesthetized animals at the onset of the experiment and periodically throughout the dim-light-rearing period, and were compared with those of normal-light-reared monkeys. We found that dim light did not produce myopia; instead, dim-light monkeys were hyperopic relative to normal-light monkeys (median refractive errors at ~155 days, OD: +3.13 D vs. +2.31 D; OS: +3.31D vs. +2.44 D; at ~310 days, OD: +2.75D vs. +1.78D, OS: +3.00D vs. +1.75D). In addition, dim-light rearing caused sustained thickening in the choroid, but it did not alter corneal power development, nor did it change the axial nature of the refractive errors. These results showed that, for rhesus monkeys and possibly other primates, low ambient lighting by itself is not necessarily myopiagenic, but might compromise the efficiency of emmetropization.

Indexed as

HyperopiaLightingAnimalsAnimals, NewbornChickensCorneaEyeMacaca mulattaRefraction, OcularAmbient lightingEmmetropizationLight intensityMyopiaNon-human primates

Identifiers

PMID32777589
PMCPMC7487012
OpenAlexW3048210079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.