Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32777011›Full record

ArticleJAMA psychiatry2020

Maternal Use of Specific Antidepressant Medications During Early Pregnancy and the Risk of Selected Birth Defects.

Kayla N Anderson, Jennifer N Lind, Regina M Simeone, William V Bobo, Allen A Mitchell, Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso, Kara N Polen, Jennita Reefhuis

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Sertraline-induced 5-HT dysregulation in mouse cardiomyocytes and the impact on calcium handling.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kayla N AndersonDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jennifer N LindDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Regina M SimeoneDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
William V BoboDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Allen A MitchellSlone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Tiffany Riehle-ColarussoDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Kara N PolenDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jennita ReefhuisDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities · USBoston University · USJacksonville College · US

Funding

NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Antidepressants are commonly used during pregnancy, but limited information is available about individual antidepressants and specific birth defect risks. Objective: To examine associations between individual antidepressants and specific birth defects with and without attempts to partially account for potential confounding by underlying conditions. Design, Setting, and Participants: The population-based, multicenter case-control National Birth Defects Prevention Study (October 1997-December 2011) included cases with selected birth defects who were identified from surveillance systems; controls were randomly sampled live-born infants without major birth defects. Mothers of cases and controls participated in an interview after the expected delivery date. The data were analyzed after the completion of the National Birth Defects Prevent Study's data collection. Exposures: Self-reported antidepressant exposure was coded to indicate monotherapy exposure to antidepressants. Main Outcomes and Measures: We used multivariable logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals for associations between maternal antidepressant use and birth defects. We compared early pregnancy antidepressant-exposed women with those without antidepressant exposure and, to partially account for confounding by underlying maternal conditions, those exposed to antidepressants outside of the birth defect development critical period. Results: This study included 30 630 case mothers of infants with birth defects and 11 478 control mothers (aged 12-53 years). Early pregnancy antidepressant use was reported by 1562 case mothers (5.1%) and 467 control mothers (4.1%), for whom elevated aORs were observed for individual selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and selected congenital heart defects (CHD) (eg, fluoxetine and anomalous pulmonary venous return: aOR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.10-5.93; this association was attenuated after partially accounting for underlying conditions: aOR, 1.89; 95% CI, 0.56-6.42). This pattern was observed for many SSRI-CHD combinations. Associations between SSRIs and non-CHD birth defects often persisted or strengthened after partially accounting for underlying conditions (eg, citalopram and diaphragmatic hernia: aOR, 5.11; 95% CI, 1.29-20.24). Venlafaxine had elevated associations with multiple defects that persisted after partially accounting for underlying conditions (eg, anencephaly and craniorachischisis: aOR, 9.14; 95% CI, 1.91-43.83). Conclusions and Relevance: We found some associations between maternal antidepressant use and specific birth defects. Venlafaxine was associated with the highest number of defects, which needs confirmation given the limited literature on venlafaxine use during pregnancy and risk for birth defects. Our results suggest confounding by underlying conditions should be considered when assessing risk. Fully informed treatment decision-making requires balancing the risks and benefits of proposed interventions against those of untreated depression or anxiety.

Indexed as

Abnormalities, Drug-InducedAdolescentAdultBupropionCase-Control StudiesChildFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy Trimester, FirstSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSerotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake InhibitorsVenlafaxine HydrochlorideYoung AdultBupropionSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSerotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake InhibitorsVenlafaxine Hydrochloride

Identifiers

PMID32777011
PMCPMC7407327
OpenAlexW3047060676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.