Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32776990›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Time and Covid-19 stress in the lockdown situation: Time free, «Dying» of boredom and sadness.

Sylvie Droit-Volet, Sandrine Gil, Natalia Martinelli, Nicolas Andant, Maélys Clinchamps, Lénise Parreira, Karine Rouffiac, Michael Dambrun, Pascal Huguet, Benoît Dubuis and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00430818, which is not on this map. Cited by 95 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00430818 no registry record found
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Digital training for building resilience: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Dissociative symptoms during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic situation in mental health patients.Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sylvie Droit-VoletUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, LAPSCO, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1523-952X
Sandrine GilUniversité de Poitiers, CNRS, UMR 7295, Poitiers, France.
Natalia MartinelliUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, LAPSCO, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Nicolas AndantUniversity Hospital of Clermont Ferrand, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clinical Research and Innovation Direction - Biostatistics, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Maélys ClinchampsUniversity Hospital of Clermont Ferrand, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Lénise ParreiraUniversity Hospital of Clermont Ferrand, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Karine RouffiacUniversity Hospital of Clermont Ferrand, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Michael DambrunUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, LAPSCO, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Pascal HuguetUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, LAPSCO, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Benoît DubuisUniversité de Genève, UNIGE, Fondation INARTIS, Genève, Switzerland.
Bruno PereiraUniversity Hospital of Clermont Ferrand, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clinical Research and Innovation Direction - Biostatistics, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3778-7161
COVISTRESS network
Jean-Baptiste BouillonUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, LAPSCO, Physiological and Psychosocial Stress, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Emergency Medicine, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6556-4187
Frédéric DutheilUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, LAPSCO, Physiological and Psychosocial Stress, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, WittyFit, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1468-6029

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A lockdown of people has been used as an efficient public health measure to fight against the exponential spread of the coronavirus disease (Covid-19) and allows the health system to manage the number of patients. The aim of this study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT00430818) was to evaluate the impact of both perceived stress aroused by Covid-19 and of emotions triggered by the lockdown situation on the individual experience of time. A large sample of the French population responded to a survey on their experience of the passage of time during the lockdown compared to before the lockdown. The perceived stress resulting from Covid-19 and stress at work and home were also assessed, as were the emotions felt. The results showed that people have experienced a slowing down of time during the lockdown. This time experience was not explained by the levels of perceived stress or anxiety, although these were considerable, but rather by the increase in boredom and sadness felt in the lockdown situation. The increased anger and fear of death only explained a small part of variance in the time judgment. The conscious experience of time therefore reflected the psychological difficulties experienced during lockdown and was not related to their perceived level of stress or anxiety.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusBoredomAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnxietyCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FearFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemics

Identifiers

PMID32776990
PMCPMC7416923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.