SynthesisThe Journal of international medical research2020
Dexmedetomidine versus magnesium sulfate as an adjuvant to local anesthetics in spinal anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in The Journal of international medical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Determination of Median Effective Concentration (ECDrug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Intrathecal dexmedetomidine improves epidural labor analgesia effects: a randomized controlled trial.The Journal of international medical research · 2021Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulfate as an adjuvant to local anesthetics in spinal anesthesia.
methodsA search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was performed. Randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulfate as a local anesthetic adjuvant in spinal anesthesia were identified. The primary outcome was sensory block duration. The mean difference (MD) or odds ratio along with the 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to analyze the outcomes.
resultsSix studies involving 360 patients were included. Intrathecal dexmedetomidine was associated with a significantly longer sensory block duration (MD = -73.62; 95% CI = -101.09 to -46.15), faster onsets of sensory blockade and motor blockade, and a longer motor block duration than intrathecal magnesium sulfate. There was no significant difference between the regarding the rates of hypotension, bradycardia, shivering, and postoperative nausea and vomiting between the groups.
conclusionsDexmedetomidine is superior to magnesium sulfate as an adjuvant to local anesthetics in spinal anesthesia because of its more rapid onset and longer duration of spinal block without significant adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.