ArticleInvestigative radiology2020
Variability and Standardization of Quantitative Imaging.
Article in Investigative radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning CT model for stratified diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: multicenter development, validation, and real-world clinical impact.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Review on the Application of Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Postsurgical Recurrence Risk in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Computed Tomography, Positron Emission Tomography, and Clinical Data.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2025Review
- Advancements in deep learning for early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease using multimodal neuroimaging: challenges and future directions.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2025Review
- The role of parametric feature maps to correct different volume of interest sizes: an in vivo liver MRI study.European radiology experimental · 2023Article
- Stability of Radiomic Features across Different Region of Interest Sizes-A CT and MR Phantom Study.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32776768What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.