Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32776609›Full record

ArticleAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)2020

The Nature of Strong Chalcogen Bonds Involving Chalcogen-Containing Heterocycles.

Gebhard Haberhauer, Rolf Gleiter

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Understanding Non-Covalent Interactions in Diphenyldiselenide and Diphenylselenide Cocrystals Using a CombinedThe journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2025
    Article
  10. Supramolecular Chalcogen-Bonded Shape Memory Actuators.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. OJACS Au · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gebhard HaberhauerInstitut für Organische Chemie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstr. 7, 45117, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5427-7510
Rolf GleiterOrganisch-Chemisches Institut, Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 270, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft HA 2973/15-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chalcogen bonds are σ hole interactions and have been used in recent years as an alternative to hydrogen bonds. In general, the electrostatic potential at the chalcogen atom and orbital delocalization effects are made responsible for the orientation of the chalcogen bond. Here, we were able to show by means of SAPT calculations that neither the induction (orbital delocalization effects) nor the electrostatic term is causing the spatial orientation of strong chalcogen bonds in tellurium-containing aromatics. Instead, steric interactions (Pauli repulsion) are responsible for the orientation. Against chemical intuition the dispersion energies of the examined tellurium-containing aromatics are far less important for the net attractive forces compared to the energies in the corresponding sulfur and selenium compounds. Our results underline the importance of often overlooked steric interactions (Pauli repulsion) in conformational control of σ hole interactions.

Indexed as

chalcogen bondingDFT calculationsSAPTsteric interactions

Identifiers

PMID32776609
PMCPMC7693109
OpenAlexW3047906526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.