Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32776542›Full record

SynthesisTransfusion2020

Leukapheresis for the management of hyperleukocytosis in acute myeloid leukemia-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jan P Bewersdorf, Smith Giri, Martin S Tallman, Amer M Zeidan, Maximilian Stahl

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Transfusion, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Therapeutic Leukapheresis: Experience of a Single Oncologic Centre.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Emergencies in Hematology: Why, When and How I Treat?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jan P BewersdorfDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3352-0902
Smith GiriDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Martin S TallmanLeukemia Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Amer M ZeidanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Maximilian StahlLeukemia Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USYale University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Yale Pathology Tissue Services Shared ResourceP30CA016359 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MEGAN C KING · 1985 to 2026
$85.0M
CLINICAL SCHOLARS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32CA009512 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Ping Chi · 1985 to 2026
$6.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016359NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009512NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIH HHS P30 CA016359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUp to 20% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) present with hyperleukocytosis, usually defined as a white blood cell (WBC) count greater than 100 × 10 STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsFor this systematic review and meta-analysis we searched MEDLINE and EMBASE via Ovid, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science from inception through March 2020 for multiarm studies comparing early mortality rates of patients with AML treated with leukapheresis and those who were not. The risk ratio (RR) of early death for patients who received leukapheresis vs patients who did not was estimated using a sum of the log-ratio of individual study estimates weighted by sample size.

resultsAmong 13 two-arm, retrospective studies with 1743 patients (486 leukapheresis and 1257 nonleukapheresis patients), leukapheresis did not improve the primary outcome of early mortality compared to treatment strategies in which leukapheresis was not used (RR, 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-1.13; P = .321) without statistically significant heterogeneity between studies (Cochran's Q, 18; P = .115; I

conclusionAs we did not find evidence of a short-term mortality benefit and considering the associated complications and logistic burden, our results argue against the routine use of leukapheresis for hyperleukocytosis among patients with AML.

Indexed as

LeukapheresisLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteLeukocytosisDisease-Free SurvivalHumansHydroxyureaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurvival RateHydroxyurea

Identifiers

PMID32776542
PMCPMC8631180
OpenAlexW3048521495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.