Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32776493›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2020

Work volume is an important variable in determining the degree of inhibitory control improvements following resistance exercise.

Keigo Tomoo, Tadashi Suga, Takeshi Sugimoto, Daichi Tanaka, Kento Shimoho, Kento Dora, Ernest Mok, Shawn Matsumoto, Hayato Tsukamoto, Shingo Takada and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Keigo TomooFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.
Tadashi SugaFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0313-9660
Takeshi SugimotoFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.
Daichi TanakaFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.
Kento ShimohoFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.
Kento DoraFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.
Ernest MokFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.
Shawn MatsumotoDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Hayato TsukamotoFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5512-0497
Shingo TakadaDepartment of Sports Education, Faculty of Lifelong Sport, Hokusho University, Ebetsu, Hokkaido, Japan.
Takeshi HashimotoFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.
Tadao IsakaFaculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.
Ritsumeikan University · JPHokusho University · JPThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously determined that improvement in cognitive inhibitory control (IC) immediately after localized resistance exercise was greater for high-intensity resistance exercise (HRE) than for low-intensity resistance exercise (LRE). However, our previous study used the same total repetitions (i.e., same repetitions per set) between HRE and LRE; therefore, the difference in postexercise IC improvement might be due to a difference in work volume (i.e., intensity × total repetitions). In this study, we compared the effect of high-volume (HV)-LRE to that of volume-matched HRE on postexercise IC improvements. Twenty-two healthy, young males performed both HV-LRE and HRE in a crossover design. Exercise loads for HV-LRE and HRE were set at 35% and 70% of one-repetition maximum, respectively. The bilateral knee extension exercises for HV-LRE and HRE were programmed for six sets with 20 and 10 repetitions, respectively, per set. IC was measured using the color-word Stroop task (CWST) at six time points; baseline, pre-exercise, immediate postexercise, and every 10 min during the 30-min postexercise recovery period. The reverse-Stroop interference score decreased significantly immediately after HV-LRE and HRE compared with that before each exercise (decreasing rate >34 and >38%, respectively, vs. baseline and pre-exercise; all ps < .05), and the decreased score remained significant until 20 min after both protocols (decreasing rate >40 and >38%, respectively, vs. baseline and pre-exercise; all ps < .05). The degree of the postexercise IC improvements did not differ significantly between the two protocols. These findings suggest that HV-LRE improves IC in a similar manner to volume-matched HRE.

Indexed as

CognitionHumansMaleRandom AllocationResistance TrainingStroop TestYoung Adultbrain healthcognitive functionexercise adherencelactate

Identifiers

PMID32776493
PMCPMC7415911
OpenAlexW3048778968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.