Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32776464›Full record

Trial reportPhysiological reports2020

Response of exercise-onset vasodilator kinetics to L-citrulline supplementation during different phases of the menstrual cycle.

Joaquin U Gonzales, Stephen M Fischer, Arun Maharaj, Heather Vellers, Todd Anderson, Adcharee Karnjanapiboonwong, Seenivasan Subbiah, J M Kellawan, Arturo Figueroa

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Physiological reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joaquin U GonzalesDepartment of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6629-8511
Stephen M FischerDepartment of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Arun MaharajDepartment of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Heather VellersDepartment of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Todd AndersonDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Adcharee KarnjanapiboonwongDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Seenivasan SubbiahDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
J M KellawanDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
Arturo FigueroaDepartment of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Texas Tech University · USUniversity of Oklahoma · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether L-citrulline (CIT) supplementation during the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle would present differential effects on vasodilator kinetics in dynamically contracting muscle. Twenty-four women were studied during the follicular (day 15 after onset of menses, n = 13) or the luteal phase (day 25 after onset of menses, n = 11). Supplementation with CIT (6g/day) or placebo occurred 7-days prior to testing in a crossover design across two menstrual cycles. Forearm vascular conductance (FVC) was calculated from blood flow and mean arterial pressure measured continuously during handgrip exercise performed at 10% maximal grip strength. FVC was calculated for each duty cycle (contract:relax, 1:2s) and expressed as a change from baseline (ΔFVC) before being fit with a monoexponential model. Amplitude of the ΔFVC response and the number of duty cycles for ΔFVC to reach 63% of steady-state amplitude (τΔFVC) were derived from the model. Analysis of variance showed no difference in the amplitude of ΔFVC between CIT and placebo (p = .45) or between menstrual cycle phases (p = .11). Additionally, τΔFVC was not different (p = .35) between CIT and placebo in women tested during the follicular (6 ± 3 versus 5 ± 3 duty cycles) or luteal phase (9 ± 1 versus 8 ± 1 duty cycles) although τΔFVC was found to be slower for women tested during the luteal as compared to the follicular phase (8 ± 4 versus 5 ± 3 duty cycles, p = .02). These results indicate that exercise-onset vasodilator kinetics is unaltered with CIT supplementation in young healthy women irrespective of menstrual cycle phase.

Indexed as

ExerciseMenstrual CycleAdultBlood PressureCitrullineFemaleHand StrengthHumansMuscle, SkeletalRegional Blood FlowVasodilationVasodilator AgentsCitrullineVasodilator Agentsblood flowl-citrullinemenstrual cyclevasodilator kinetics

Identifiers

PMID32776464
PMCPMC7415908
OpenAlexW3048461235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.