Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32776285›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2021

Multiple perceptions of robotic-assisted surgery among surgeons and patients: a cross-sectional study.

Saad A Aldousari, Ali J Buabbas, Said M Yaiesh, Rawan J Alyousef, Abdullah N Alenezi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Telerehabilitation during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Patients and Physical Therapists' Experiences.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Saad A AldousariDepartment of Surgery (Urology Division), Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Safat, P.O. Box 24923, 13110, Kuwait City, Kuwait. saad.aldousari@ku.edu.kw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6045-5272
Ali J BuabbasDepartment of Community Medicine and Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Said M YaieshMubarak Al-Kabeer Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7892-5631
Rawan J AlyousefKuwait Urology Program, Kuwait Institute for Medical Specialization, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Abdullah N AleneziKuwait Urology Program, Kuwait Institute for Medical Specialization, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Kuwait Institute for Medical Specialization · KWKuwait University · KWMubarak Al Kabeer Hospital · KWThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limited data exist regarding knowledge and perceptions of surgeons and patients about robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in the Middle East. This study aimed to explore perceptions of surgeons and patients about RAS. A questionnaire-based survey was distributed among surgeons of different specialties and patients. Between March and September 2019, 278 and 256 surveys were completed by surgeons and patients, respectively (95.2% and 94.8% response rate, respectively). The surgeons' self-reported experience with technology was related to the level of comfort with computers and computer literacy. Most surgeons have heard of RAS availability, and the majority agreed to its introduction into the healthcare system. However, only 75 (27%) of the surgeons thought that the surgeon has complete control over the robot, and 69 (25%) surgeons were not sure of the level of control the surgeon has over the robot reflecting poor knowledge about this technology. Less than a third of patient respondents have heard of RAS. However, half of them would consider it should they need to undergo surgery. When compared to open surgery, 23 (9%), 26 (10%), and 94 (37%) patient respondents thought that RAS caused less pain, had fewer complications, and was faster than conventional surgery, respectively. Knowledge and perceptions about RAS are limited among surgeons and patients in Kuwait. Efforts should focus on increasing awareness.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresSurgeonsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPerceptionSurveys and Questionnairesda vinciKnowledgePerceptionsRobot-assisted surgery

Identifiers

PMID32776285
OpenAlexW3048712513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.