Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32776271›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2021

Identifying a novel 5-gene signature predicting clinical outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia.

K Sha, Y Lu, P Zhang, R Pei, X Shi, Z Fan, L Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Structure and Emerging Functions of LRCH Proteins in Leukocyte Biology.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

K ShaDepartment of Hematology, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University, No. 251, East Baizhang Road, Ningbo, 315000, Zhejiang, China. shaky78@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5639-4238
Y LuDepartment of Hematology, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University, No. 251, East Baizhang Road, Ningbo, 315000, Zhejiang, China.
P ZhangDepartment of Hematology, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University, No. 251, East Baizhang Road, Ningbo, 315000, Zhejiang, China.
R PeiDepartment of Hematology, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University, No. 251, East Baizhang Road, Ningbo, 315000, Zhejiang, China.
X ShiDepartment of Hematology, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University, No. 251, East Baizhang Road, Ningbo, 315000, Zhejiang, China.
Z FanDepartment of Hematology, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University, No. 251, East Baizhang Road, Ningbo, 315000, Zhejiang, China.
L ChenDepartment of Hematology, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University, No. 251, East Baizhang Road, Ningbo, 315000, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common type of acute leukemia and biologically heterogeneous diseases with poor prognosis. Thus, we aimed to identify prognostic markers to effectively predict the prognosis of AML patients and eventually guide treatment.

methodsPrognosis-associated genes were determined by Kaplan-Meier and multivariate analyses using the expression and clinical data of 173 AML patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas database and validated in an independent Oregon Health and Science University dataset. A prognostic risk score was computed based on a linear combination of 5-gene expression levels using the regression coefficients derived from the multivariate logistic regression model. The classification of AML was established by unsupervised hierarchical clustering of CALCRL, DOCK1, PLA2G4A, FCHO2 and LRCH4 expression levels.

resultsHigh FCHO2 and LRCH4 expression was related to decreased mortality. While high CALCRL, DOCK1, PLA2G4A expression was associated with increased mortality. The risk score was predictive of increased mortality rate in AML patients. Hierarchical clustering analysis of the five genes discovered three clusters of AML patients. The cluster1 AML patients were associated with lower cytogenetics risk than cluster2 or 3 patients, and better prognosis than cluster3 patients (P values < 0.05 for all cases, fisher exact test or log-rank test).

conclusionThe gene panel comprising CALCRL, DOCK1, PLA2G4A, FCHO2 and LRCH4 as well as the risk score may offer novel prognostic biomarkers and classification of AML patients to significantly improve outcome prediction.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionCalcitonin Receptor-Like ProteinDatabases, GeneticFatty Acid-Binding ProteinsGene Expression ProfilingGroup IV Phospholipases A2HumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMembrane ProteinsMultivariate AnalysisNerve Tissue ProteinsPrognosisrac GTP-Binding ProteinsRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeCalcitonin Receptor-Like ProteinCALCRL protein, humanDOCK1 protein, humanFatty Acid-Binding ProteinsFCHO2 protein, humanGroup IV Phospholipases A2LRRN1 protein, humanMembrane ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsPLA2G4A protein, humanrac GTP-Binding Proteins5-gene signatureAcute myeloid leukemiaOverall survivalThe cancer genome atlas database

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.