Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32776270›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2021

Unusual Sites of Necrotic Collections in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Association with Parenchymal Necrosis and Clinical Outcomes.

Pankaj Gupta, Mandeep Virk, Ajay Gulati, Gaurav Muktesh, Jimil Shah, Jayanta Samanta, Harshal Mandavdhare, Vishal Sharma, Usha Dutta, Rakesh Kochhar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pankaj GuptaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, PGIMER, Chandigarh, 160012, India. Pankajgupta959@gmail.com.
Mandeep VirkDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, PGIMER, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Ajay GulatiDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, PGIMER, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Gaurav MukteshDepartment of Gastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Jimil ShahDepartment of Gastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Jayanta SamantaDepartment of Gastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Harshal MandavdhareDepartment of Gastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Vishal SharmaDepartment of Gastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Usha DuttaDepartment of Gastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Rakesh KochharDepartment of Gastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe presence of necrotic collection in acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) at intra-abdominal sites other than the retroperitoneum has not been systematically studied.

aimTo investigate unusual sites of necrotic collections at computed tomography (CT) and to evaluate association with pancreatic necrosis and clinical outcomes.

methodsThis retrospective study comprised of consecutive patients with ANP evaluated between January 2018 and March 2019. Based on CT findings, patients were divided into two groups: collections at unusual sites (small bowel mesentery, mesocolon, omentum, subcapsular collections along liver and spleen, pelvis, anterior abdominal wall, and inguinoscrotal regions) and collections at usual retroperitoneal locations (lesser sac, gastrosplenic location, anterior and posterior pararenal spaces, and paracolic gutters). The differences in CT findings and clinical outcomes (need for drainage, length of hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, surgery, and death) between the two groups were evaluated.

resultsA total of 75 patients with ANP were evaluated. There were 25 (33.3%) patients with collections in unusual locations. These included mesentery (n = 17), splenic subcapsular location (n = 7), omentum (n = 6), hepatic subcapsular location (n = 4), anterior abdominal wall (n = 3), pelvis (n = 2), and inguinoscrotal location (n = 1). Compared to patients with collections at usual locations (n = 50), there were no differences in the CT findings except complete parenchymal necrosis (32% vs. 0%, P = .001). There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical outcomes between the two groups.

conclusionsMesenteric collections are frequent in ANP. The other non-retroperitoneal sites are infrequently involved. There is no association between unusual sites of collection and clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMaleNecrosisPancreasPancreatitis, Acute NecrotizingParenchymal TissueRetrospective StudiesAcute pancreatitisComputed tomographyMesenteryNecrotic collection

Identifiers

PMID32776270
OpenAlexW3047961225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.