ReviewDer Radiologe2020
[Assessment of lung impairment in patients with cystic fibrosis : Novel magnetic resonance imaging methods].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Functional lung imaging in thoracic tumor radiotherapy: Application and progress.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical/methodological issueThe differentiated assessment of respiratory mechanics, gas exchange and pulmonary circulation, as well as structural impairment of the lung are essential for the treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Clinical lung function measurements are often not sufficiently specific and are often difficult to perform. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
methodsThe standard procedures for pulmonary imaging are chest X‑ray and computed tomography (CT) for assessing lung morphology. In more recent studies, an increasing number of centers are using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess lung structure and function. However, functional imaging is currently limited to specialized centers. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: In patients with CF, studies showed that MRI with hyperpolarized gases and Fourier decomposition/matrix pencil MRI (FD/MP-MRI) are feasible for assessing pulmonary ventilation. For pulmonary perfusion, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) or contrast-free methods, e.g., FD-MRI, can be used. PERFORMANCE: Functional MRI provides more accurate insight into the pathophysiology of pulmonary function at the regional level. Advantages of MRI over X‑ray are its lack of ionizing radiation, the large number of lung function parameters that can be extracted using different contrast mechanisms, and ability to be used repeatedly over time. ACHIEVEMENTS: Early assessment of lung function impairment is needed as the structural changes usually occur later in the course of the disease. However, sufficient experience in clinical application exist only for certain functional lung MRI procedures. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Clinical application of the aforementioned techniques, except for DCE-MRI, should be restricted to scientific studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32776240What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.