Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32776004›Full record

ArticleToxicon: X2020

New insights into snakebite epidemiology in Costa Rica: A retrospective evaluation of medical records.

Mahmood Sasa, Sofía E Segura Cano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicon: X, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Snakebite-Associated Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bleeding and Thrombosis: Insights into Pathophysiology ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mahmood SasaInstituto Clodomiro Picado, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Sofía E Segura CanoDepartamento de Farmacología y Toxicología, Escuela de Medicina, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Universidad de Costa Rica · CR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous monitoring of the snakebite envenoming allows elucidating factors that affect its incidence at spatial and temporal scales, and is a great tool to evaluate the proper management of snakebite in health centers. To determine if there have been changes over time in snakebite epidemiology in Costa Rica, we conducted a retrospective study using medical records from six hospitals for the years 2012-2013. A total of 475 snakebite patients were treated at the selected hospital during this period. Most bites occurred during the rainy season and primarily affected young men, mainly farm workers and schoolchildren. About 55% of bites occur in peri-domiciliary environments, although its prevalence varies geographically.

Indexed as

AntivenomBothrops asperEpidemiologyPrimary care facilitySnake envenoming

Identifiers

PMID32776004
PMCPMC7398977
OpenAlexW3046755270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.