ArticleHealth equity2020
Implicit Bias in Counseling for Permanent Contraception: Historical Context and Recommendations for Counseling.
Article in Health equity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancing Equitable, Person-Centered Contraceptive Care Using Data-Driven Quality Improvement.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026Article
- Understanding delivery type as a mediator in the relationship between insurance type and permanent contraception fulfillment: a mixed-methods multi-site study.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- How theJournal of women's health (2002) · 2025Article
- The association of patient and clinician demographics and concordance with medicaid sterilization consent form validity.Journal of the National Medical Association · 2025Article
- Association Between Comorbidities and Inpatient Postpartum Permanent Contraception Completion.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2025Article
- Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Use after Non-Receipt of Postpartum Permanent Contraception: A Retrospective Analysis.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2025Article
- Patient Perspectives on Clinician Support When Pursuing Permanent Contraception in the United States.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2025Article
- Exploring adolescent-facing US clinicians' perceptions of their contraceptive counseling and use of shared decision-making: A qualitative study.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2024Article
- Modeling the impact of decreasing waiting period length for Medicaid sterilization: A multi-site cohort study.Contraception · 2024Article
- Unfulfilled and method-specific contraceptive preferences among reproductive-aged contraceptive users in Arizona, Iowa, New Jersey, and Wisconsin.Health services research · 2024Observational
- Exploring Contraceptive Experiences of Abortion-Fund Clients in the Rocky Mountain Region of the United States from a Reproductive Justice Lens.Women's reproductive health (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Intersectionality in Alzheimer's Disease: The Role of Female Sex and Black American Race in the Development and Prevalence of Alzheimer's Disease.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023Review
- Reproductive justice in post-Roe America: Impact of restricted abortion access on patients seeking permanent contraception.Contraception · 2023Article
- Medicaid and Fulfillment of Postpartum Permanent Contraception Requests.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2023Article
- Nonfulfillment of desired postpartum permanent contraception and resultant maternal and pregnancy health outcomes.AJOG global reports · 2023Article
- Association of Opioid Use Disorder and Provision of Highly Effective Inpatient Postpartum Contraception.Open access journal of contraception · 2023Article
- Provider verbal disrespect in the provision of family planning in public-sector facilities in Western Kenya.SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2022Article
- "Post-Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We provide an overview of the causes, manifestations, and potential mitigating steps regarding implicit bias in counseling for permanent contraception. The historical context of sterilization abuses and the implications of these on society's notions of fitness for parenthood are reviewed. We present contemporary examples of contraceptive coercion and discuss the impact of implicit bias from health care providers. Finally, we outline steps for ensuring a patient-centered shared decision-making ethical approach to permanent contraceptive counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.