Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32775784›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Implementing a Novel Remote Physician Treatment Coverage Practice for Adaptive Radiation Therapy During the Coronavirus Pandemic.

Alex Price, Hyun Kim, Lauren E Henke, Nels C Knutson, Matthew B Spraker, Jeff Michalski, Geoffrey D Hugo, Clifford G Robinson, Olga Green

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Practice-based training strategy for therapist-driven prostate MR-Linac adaptive radiotherapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2023
    Article
  6. The Impact of COVID-19 on US Radiation Oncology Residents.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  7. Pathway for radiation therapists online advanced adapter training and credentialing.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alex PriceDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Hyun KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Lauren E HenkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Nels C KnutsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Matthew B SprakerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Jeff MichalskiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Geoffrey D HugoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Clifford G RobinsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Olga GreenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe 2019 coronavirus disease pandemic has placed an increased importance on physical distancing to minimize the risk of transmission in radiation oncology departments. The pandemic has also increased the use of hypofractionated treatment schedules where magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) can aid in dose escalation. This specialized technique requires increased staffing in close proximity, and thus the need for novel coverage practices to increase physical distancing while still providing specialty care. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A remote-physician ART coverage practice was developed and described using commercially available software products. Our remote-physician coverage practice provided control to the physician to contour and review of the images and plans. The time from completion of image registration to the beginning of treatment was recorded for 20 fractions before remote-physician ART coverage and 14 fractions after implementation of remote-physician ART coverage. Visual quality was calculated using cross-correlation between the treatment delivery and remote-physician computer screens.

resultsFor the 14 fractions after implementation, the average time from image registration to the beginning of treatment was 24.9 ± 6.1 minutes. In comparison, the 20 fractions analyzed without remote coverage had an average time of 29.2 ± 9.8 minutes. The correlation between the console and remote-physician screens was

conclusionsOur novel remote-physician ART coverage practice is secure, interactive, timely, and of high visual quality. When using remote physicians for ART, our department was able to increase physical distancing to lower the risk of virus transmission while providing specialty care to patients in need.

Identifiers

PMID32775784
PMCPMC7246005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.