ArticleHeliyon2020
Population-derived cut-off for HbA1c could enhance the identification of metabolic syndrome among non-diabetic population.
Article in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in African populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Predictive factors for metabolic syndrome in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Linking serum malondialdehyde with dyslipidemia in patients with metabolic syndrome.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Prevalence of cognitive impairment and metabolic syndrome among older adults in calabar metropolis and the associated risk factors.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetabolic syndrome (MetS) is a multifactorial disorder and a predisposing factor for diabetes, heart diseases, and stroke. Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) has recently received considerable attention as a potential marker to identify subjects at risk of MetS. This study aimed at assessing the performance of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), the American Diabetes Association (ADA) HbA1c cut-off, and a population-derived HbA1c (pHbA1c) cut-off value as the glycaemic criterion for MetS in a non-diabetic population.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, we recruited 728 non-diabetic Ghanaian adults. Venous blood sample was obtained and fasting plasma insulin and glucose, HbA1c, lipid profile, blood pressure and anthropometric measurements were performed for each respondent.
resultsThe prevalence of MetS using the FPG, ADA HbA1c and pHbA1c criteria were 35.2%, 38.5% and 41.8%, respectively. The pHbA1c cut-off identified 6.6% and 3.3% more subjects with MetS when compared with FPG and the ADA HbA1c cut-offs, respectively while the ADA HbA1c cut-off identified 3.3% more subjects with MetS compared with the FPG criterion. The ADA HbA1c criterion showed a substantial agreement (ĸ = 0.79) with the FPG criterion while pHbA1c showed an almost perfect concordance (ĸ = 0.82) with the FPG criterion and an excellent sensitivity and specificity for identifying subjects with MetS in the study population.
conclusionScreening of MetS by introduction of the ADA HbA1c criterion in addition to the traditional FPG criterion enhances the detection of more people with MetS. However, the use of population-derived HbA1c cut-off value could potentially identify even greater number of high risk subjects in that specific population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.