Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32775505›Full record

ReviewMovement disorders clinical practice2020

Measuring Medication Adherence in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review of Contributing Components in Rating Scales.

Michelle H S Tosin, Glenn T Stebbins, Christopher G Goetz, Rosimere F Santana, Marco A A Leite, Beatriz Guitton R B Oliveira

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Innovative Approaches to Enhance and Measure Medication Adherence in Chronic Disease Management: A Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The impact of poor medication knowledge on health-related quality of life in people with Parkinson's disease: a mediation analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michelle H S TosinDepartment of Nursing Fluminense Federal University Niterói Rio de Janeiro Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7309-1407
Glenn T StebbinsDepartment of Neurological Sciences Rush University Medical Center Chicago Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7905-9336
Christopher G GoetzDepartment of Neurological Sciences Rush University Medical Center Chicago Illinois USA.
Rosimere F SantanaDepartment of Nursing Fluminense Federal University Niterói Rio de Janeiro Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4593-3715
Marco A A LeiteDepartment of Nursing Fluminense Federal University Niterói Rio de Janeiro Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1447-3696
Beatriz Guitton R B OliveiraDepartment of Nursing Fluminense Federal University Niterói Rio de Janeiro Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7494-7457
Rush University Medical Center · USUniversidade Federal Fluminense · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor medication adherence in chronic illnesses such as Parkinson's disease (PD) is a significant but potentially addressable issue if core components are systematically measured.

objectiveTo assess whether rating scales used in PD adequately cover essential components of medication adherence.

methodsWe accessed 5 databases targeting articles published before October 2019 and using rating scales to measure medication adherence in PD. The ABC Taxonomy from the European Ascertaining Barriers to Compliance Consortium and World Health Organization recommendations were used as the evaluation standard of 5 essential adherence dimensions (patient-based, health system-based, social-based, therapy-based, and health condition-based), 3 phases (initiation, implementation, and discontinuation), and 2 factors (intentional and nonintentional).

resultsWe screened 192 and selected 16 studies, collectively using 5 medication adherence rating scales. No scale covered all essential components of medication adherence (dimensions, phases, factors). The Morisky Medication Adherence Scales were the most frequently used (11 studies), but they measure only 2 dimensions and phases. The Stendal Adherence to Medication Score (used in 1 study) measured all phases but only 2 dimensions, and the Brief Medication Questionnaire (used in 3 studies) measured 3 dimensions and 2 phases. Distinctions between intentional and nonintentional factors were not completely considered in any scale.

conclusionsAlthough multiple studies target medication adherence in PD, the used scales did not measure all recommended components, highlighting the need to develop a sensitive, specific, and comprehensive tool for measuring medication adherence among patients with PD.

Indexed as

medication adherencenursingParkinson's diseaserating scaleWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID32775505
PMCPMC7396838
OpenAlexW3035928294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.