Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32775486›Full record

ArticleLanguage, cognition and neuroscience2019

Categories, Concepts, and Conceptual Development.

Vladimir M Sloutsky, Wei Sophia Deng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Language, cognition and neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Decomposing unaccusativity: a statistical modelling approach.Language, cognition and neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The structure of prior knowledge enhances memory in experts by reducing interference.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vladimir M SloutskyDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University.
Wei Sophia DengDepartment of Psychology, University of Macau.

Funding

ONTOGENESIS OF CATEGORIZATION: LINKING DEVELOPMENT, MECHANISMS, AND BIOLOGYP01HD080679 · NICHD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LOVE, BRADLEY C · 2016 to 2020
$5.8M
The Development of CategorizationR01HD078545 · NICHD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SLOUTSKY, VLADIMIR M · 2014 to 2025
$4.7M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD080679NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD078545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concepts (i.e., lexicalized classes of real or fictitious entities) play a central role in many human intellectual activities, including planning, thinking, reasoning, problem solving, and decision making. How do people

Indexed as

Categorizationconceptual developmentsemantic development

Identifiers

PMID32775486
PMCPMC7410261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.