Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32775430›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2020

Onlay Repair Technique for the Management of Ureteral Strictures: A Comprehensive Review.

Shengwei Xiong, Jie Wang, Weijie Zhu, Kunlin Yang, Guangpu Ding, Xuesong Li, Daniel D Eun

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Laparoscopic ventral onlay ureteroplasty with buccal mucosa graft for complex proximal ureteral stricture.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shengwei XiongDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4885-899X
Jie WangDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China.
Weijie ZhuDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China.
Kunlin YangDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China.
Guangpu DingDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China.
Xuesong LiDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7030-0856
Daniel D EunDepartment of Urology, Temple University School of Medicine, 255S 17th Street, 7th Floor Medical Tower, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7630-2740
Peking University · CNTemple University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ureteroplasty using onlay grafts or flaps emerged as an innovative procedure for the management of proximal and midureteral strictures. Autologous grafts or flaps used commonly in ureteroplasty include the oral mucosae, bladder mucosae, ileal mucosae, and appendiceal mucosae. Oral mucosa grafts, especially buccal mucosa grafts (BMGs), have gained wide acceptance as a graft choice for ureteroplasty. The reported length of BMG ureteroplasty ranged from 1.5 to 11 cm with success rates of 71.4%-100%. However, several studies have demonstrated that ureteroplasty using lingual mucosa grafts yields better recipient site outcomes and fewer donor site complications than that using BMGs. In addition, there is no essential difference in the efficacy and complication rates of BMG ureteroplasty using an anterior approach or a posterior approach. Intestinal graft or flap ureteroplasty was also reported. And the reported length of ileal or appendiceal flap ureteroplasty ranged from 1 to 8 cm with success rates of 75%-100%. Moreover, the bladder mucosa, renal pelvis wall, and penile/preputial skin have also been reported to be used for ureteroplasty and have achieved satisfactory outcomes, but each graft or flap has unique advantages and potential problems. Tissue engineering-based ureteroplasty through the implantation of patched scaffolds, such as the small intestine submucosa, with or without cell seeding, has induced successful ureteral regeneration structurally close to that of the native ureter and has resulted in good functional outcomes in animal models.

Indexed as

AnimalsConstriction, PathologicHumansMouth MucosaPlastic Surgery ProceduresSurgical FlapsUreterUrethral Stricture

Identifiers

PMID32775430
PMCPMC7407031
OpenAlexW3045555614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.